Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A DEA Analysis in Latin American Ports: Measuring the Performance of Guayaquil Contecon Port

  • Emilio J. Morales-Núñez
  • , Xavier R. Seminario-Vergara
  • , Sonia Valeria Avilés-Sacoto*
  • , Galo Eduardo Mosquera-Recalde
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidad San Francisco de Quito

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

In this globalized era, the port sector has been a major influence in a country’s economic growth. Ports have become one of the main funnels to enhance competitiveness in emerging markets of Latin America. Therefore, it is relevant to carry out an analysis of their performance. A good approach to measure performance is DEA, a mathematical tool that handles a benchmark analysis by an evaluation of multiple factors that describes the nature of an entity. The research herein aims to evaluate and compare the performance of the Ecuadorian Guayaquil Contecon Port in comparison with 14 major ports in Latin American and the Caribbean by using DEA. As a result of the study, the efficiency scores of the ports are analyzed to propose best practices to improve the performance of Guayaquil Contecon Port.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationInternational Series in Operations Research and Management Science
PublisherSpringer
Pages279-309
Number of pages31
DOIs
StatePublished - 2020

Publication series

NameInternational Series in Operations Research and Management Science
Volume290
ISSN (Print)0884-8289
ISSN (Electronic)2214-7934

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth

Keywords

  • Best practices
  • DEA
  • Efficiency
  • Guayaquil Contecon Port
  • Ports
  • TEU

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A DEA Analysis in Latin American Ports: Measuring the Performance of Guayaquil Contecon Port'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this