Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods

  • Neil Cox
  • , Bruce E. Young*
  • , Philip Bowles
  • , Miguel Fernandez
  • , Julie Marin
  • , Giovanni Rapacciuolo
  • , Monika Böhm
  • , Thomas M. Brooks
  • , S. Blair Hedges
  • , Craig Hilton-Taylor
  • , Michael Hoffmann
  • , Richard K.B. Jenkins
  • , Marcelo F. Tognelli
  • , Graham J. Alexander
  • , Allen Allison
  • , Natalia B. Ananjeva
  • , Mark Auliya
  • , Luciano Javier Avila
  • , David G. Chapple
  • , Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia
  • Harold G. Cogger, Guarino R. Colli, Anslem de Silva, Carla C. Eisemberg, Johannes Els, Ansel Fong G, Tandora D. Grant, Rodney A. Hitchmough, Djoko T. Iskandar, Noriko Kidera, Marcio Martins, Shai Meiri, Nicola J. Mitchell, Sanjay Molur, Cristiano de C. Nogueira, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Johannes Penner, Anders G.J. Rhodin, Gilson A. Rivas, Mark Oliver Rödel, Uri Roll, Kate L. Sanders, Georgina Santos-Barrera, Glenn M. Shea, Stephen Spawls, Bryan L. Stuart, Krystal A. Tolley, Jean François Trape, Marcela A. Vidal, Philipp Wagner, Bryan P. Wallace, Yan Xie
*Corresponding author for this work
  • IUCN - CI Biodiversity Assessment Unit
  • Conservation International
  • NatureServe
  • Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation and Department of Environmental Science and Policy
  • George Mason University
  • Instituto de Ecología
  • Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Bolivia
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • Institute for Biodiversity Science and Sustainability
  • California Academy of Sciences
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF)
  • University of the Philippines
  • University of Tasmania
  • Center for Biodiversity
  • Temple University
  • IUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team
  • EDGE of Existence programme
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • Bishop Museum
  • Department of Herpetology
  • Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Department of Herpetology
  • Research Museum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • School of Biological Sciences
  • Monash University
  • Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad
  • Australian Museum
  • Departamento de Zoologia
  • Universidade de Brasília
  • Crocodile Specialist Group
  • South Asia Regional Office
  • Charles Darwin University
  • Environment and Protected Areas Authority Sharjah
  • Museo de Historia Natural “Tomás Romay”
  • Conservation Science and Wildlife Health
  • Zoological Society of San Diego
  • New Zealand's Department of Conservation
  • Bandung Institute of Technology
  • Department of Biosphere-Geosphere Science
  • Okayama University of Science
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • Instituto de Biociências
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Tel Aviv University
  • School of Biological Sciences
  • University of Western Australia
  • Zoo Outreach Organization
  • Departamento de Zoología
  • Universidad de Concepción
  • Chair of Wildlife Ecology and Management
  • University of Freiburg
  • Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science
  • Chelonian Research Foundation
  • Museo de Biologia
  • Universidad del Zulia
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • Adelaide University
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • The University of Sydney
  • Section of Research & Collections
  • North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute
  • Institut de recherche pour le développement
  • Departamento de Ciencias Básicas
  • Universidad del Bío-Bío
  • Allwetterzoo Münster
  • Ecolibrium, Inc
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

413 Scopus citations

Abstract

Comprehensive assessments of species’ extinction risks have documented the extinction crisis1 and underpinned strategies for reducing those risks2. Global assessments reveal that, among tetrapods, 40.7% of amphibians, 25.4% of mammals and 13.6% of birds are threatened with extinction3. Because global assessments have been lacking, reptiles have been omitted from conservation-prioritization analyses that encompass other tetrapods4–7. Reptiles are unusually diverse in arid regions, suggesting that they may have different conservation needs6. Here we provide a comprehensive extinction-risk assessment of reptiles and show that at least 1,829 out of 10,196 species (21.1%) are threatened—confirming a previous extrapolation8 and representing 15.6 billion years of phylogenetic diversity. Reptiles are threatened by the same major factors that threaten other tetrapods—agriculture, logging, urban development and invasive species—although the threat posed by climate change remains uncertain. Reptiles inhabiting forests, where these threats are strongest, are more threatened than those in arid habitats, contrary to our prediction. Birds, mammals and amphibians are unexpectedly good surrogates for the conservation of reptiles, although threatened reptiles with the smallest ranges tend to be isolated from other threatened tetrapods. Although some reptiles—including most species of crocodiles and turtles—require urgent, targeted action to prevent extinctions, efforts to protect other tetrapods, such as habitat preservation and control of trade and invasive species, will probably also benefit many reptiles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-290
Number of pages6
JournalNature
Volume605
Issue number7909
DOIs
StatePublished - 12 May 2022

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this