Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial

  • Nishita Singh*
  • , Carol C. Kenney
  • , Ken S. Butcher
  • , Brian Buck
  • , Philip A. Barber
  • , Thalia S. Field
  • , Philip M. Choi
  • , Amy Y.X. Yu
  • , Timothy Kleinig
  • , Ramana Appireddy
  • , Carlos A. Molina
  • , Keith W. Muir
  • , Michael D. Hill
  • , Shelagh B. Coutts
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Manitoba
  • University of Calgary
  • University of New South Wales
  • University of Alberta
  • University of British Columbia
  • Monash University
  • University of Toronto
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital
  • Queen's University Kingston
  • Vall d’Hebron Stroke Center
  • University of Glasgow
  • University of Calgary

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Almost half of acute ischemic stroke patients present with mild symptoms and there are large practice variations in their treatment globally. Individuals with an intracranial occlusion who present with minor stroke are at an increased risk of early neurological deterioration and poor outcomes. Individual patient data meta-analysis in the subgroup of patients with minor deficits showed benefit of alteplase in improving outcomes; however, this benefit has not been seen with intravenous alteplase in published randomized trials. Design: TEMPO-2 (A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) is a prospective, open label with blinded outcome assessment, randomized controlled trial, designed to test the superiority of intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) over nonthrombolytic standard of care, with an estimated sample size of 1274 patients. Adult patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) ⩽ 5 and visible arterial occlusion or perfusion deficit within 12 h of onset are randomized to receive either tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) or standard of care. The primary outcome is return to baseline neurological functioning, measured by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) at 90 days. Safety outcomes include death and symptomatic hemorrhage (intra or extra-cranial). Other secondary outcomes include mRS 0–1, mRS 0–2, ordinal shift analysis of the mRS, partial, and full recanalization on follow-up computed tomography angiogram. Conclusion: Results of this trial will aid in determining whether there is benefit of using tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) in treating patients presenting with minor stroke who are at high risk of developing poor outcomes due to presence of an intracranial occlusion. Data access statement: Data will be available upon reasonable request.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)817-822
Number of pages6
JournalInternational Journal of Stroke
Volume19
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acute stroke therapy
  • Tenecteplase
  • clinical trial
  • minor stroke
  • protocols
  • thrombolysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tenecteplase Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke with Proven Occlusion (TEMPO-2): Rational and design of a multicenter, randomized open-label clinical trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this