Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Advance consent in acute stroke trials: Survey of canadian research ethics board chairs

  • Rena Seeger
  • , Ubong Udoh
  • , Brian Dewar
  • , Stuart Nicholls
  • , Mark Fedyk
  • , Robert Fahed
  • , Jeff Perry
  • , Michael D. Hill
  • , Bijoy Menon
  • , Richard H. Swartz
  • , Alexandre Y. Poppe
  • , Sophia Gocan
  • , Jamie Brehaut
  • , Katie Dainty
  • , Victoria Shepherd
  • , Dar Dowlatshahi
  • , Michel Shamy*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of California at Davis
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Toronto
  • Centre Hospitalier de L'Universite de Montreal
  • North York General Hospital
  • Cardiff University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Advance consent could allow individuals at high risk of stroke to provide consent before they might become eligible for enrollment in acute stroke trials. This survey explores the acceptability of this novel technique to Canadian Research Ethics Board (REB) chairs that review acute stroke trials. Responses from 15 REB chairs showed that majority of respondents expressed comfort approving studies that adopt advance consent. There was no clear preference for advance consent over deferral of consent, although respondents expressed significant concern with broad rather than trial-specific advance consent. These findings shed light on the acceptability of advance consent to Canadian ethics regulators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)285-288
Number of pages4
JournalCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences
Volume51
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 24 Mar 2024
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • advance directives
  • Consent
  • research ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Advance consent in acute stroke trials: Survey of canadian research ethics board chairs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this