Are unadjusted analyses of clinical trials inappropriately biased toward the null?

David M. Kent; Thomas A. Trikalinos; Michael D. Hill

doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532051

Are unadjusted analyses of clinical trials inappropriately biased toward the null?

David M. Kent^*
, Thomas A. Trikalinos
, Michael D. Hill

^*Corresponding author for this work

Tufts Medical Center
University of Calgary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Editorial

17 Scopus citations

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	672-673
Number of pages	2
Journal	Stroke
Volume	40
Issue number	3
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532051
State	Published - Mar 2009
Externally published	Yes

Keywords

Clinical trials
Statistical analysis

Access to Document

10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532051

Cite this

@article{9857db8731ee4a8d94a6598de19cfd4e,

title = "Are unadjusted analyses of clinical trials inappropriately biased toward the null?",

keywords = "Clinical trials, Statistical analysis",

author = "Kent, \{David M.\} and Trikalinos, \{Thomas A.\} and Hill, \{Michael D.\}",

year = "2009",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.532051",

language = "Ingl{\'e}s",

volume = "40",

pages = "672--673",

journal = "Stroke",

issn = "0039-2499",