Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems

  • Mateo Scoggins
  • , Derek B. Booth
  • , Tim Fletcher
  • , Megan Fork
  • , Ana Gonzalez
  • , Rebecca L. Hale
  • , Robert J. Hawley
  • , Allison H. Roy
  • , Erika E. Bilger
  • , Nick Bond
  • , Matthew James Burns
  • , Kristina G. Hopkins
  • , Kate H. Macneale
  • , Eugenia Martí
  • , S. Kyle McKay
  • , Martin W. Neale
  • , Michael J. Paul
  • , Blanca Rios-Touma
  • , Kathryn L. Russell
  • , Robert F. Smith
  • Staryn Wagner, Seth Wenger
  • Watershed Protection Department
  • University of California at Santa Barbara
  • University of Melbourne
  • West Chester University
  • Idaho State University
  • Sustainable Streams, LLC
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst
  • Illinois Natural History Survey
  • La Trobe University
  • Forest and Rangeland Ecosystem Science Center
  • Water and Land Resources Division
  • CSIC - Centre of Advanced Studies of Blanes
  • United States Army Engineer Research and Development Center
  • Puhoi Stour
  • Tetra Tech
  • Universidad de las Americas - Ecuador
  • Lycoming College
  • University of Georgia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Urban streams can provide amenities to people living in cities, but those benefits are reduced when streams become degraded, potentially even causing harm (disease, toxic compounds, etc.). Governments and institutions invest resources to improve the values and services provided by urban streams; however, the conception, development, and implementation of such projects may not include meaningful involvement of community members and other stakeholders. Consequently, project objectives may be misaligned with community desires and needs, and projects may fail to achieve their goals. In February 2020, the 5th Symposium on Urbanization and Stream Ecology, an interdisciplinary meeting held every 3 to 5 y, met in Austin, Texas, USA, to explore new approaches to urban stream projects, including ways to maximize the full range of potential benefits by better integrating community members into project identification and decision making. The symposium included in-depth discussion about 4 nearby field case studies, participation of multidisciplinary urban stream experts from 5 con-tinents, and input from the Austin community. Institutional barriers to community inclusion were identified and analyzed using real-world examples, both from the case studies and from the literature, which clarified dispar-ities in power, equity, and values. Outcomes of the symposium have been aggregated into a vision that challenges the present institutional approach to urban stream management and a set of strategies to systematically address these barriers to improve restoration solutions. Integrating community members and other stakeholders through-out the urban restoration process, and a transparent decision-making process to resolve divergent objectives, can help identify appropriate goals for realizing both the ecological and social benefits of stream restoration.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)404-419
Number of pages16
JournalFreshwater Science
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities

Keywords

  • co-creation
  • community
  • ecosystem service
  • multi-benefit
  • restoration
  • socioecological
  • sustainable
  • transdisciplinary
  • urban streams

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Community-powered urban stream restoration: A vision for sustainable and resilient urban ecosystems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this