Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Development of a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus-Based Treatment Protocol Conference in Latin America

  • Peter Hendrickson
  • , James Pridgeon
  • , Nancy R. Temkin
  • , Walter Videtta
  • , Gustavo Petroni
  • , Silvia Lujan
  • , Nahuel Guadagnoli
  • , Zulma Urbina
  • , Perla Blanca Pahnke
  • , Daniel Godoy
  • , Gustavo Pinero
  • , Freddy Sandi Lora
  • , Sergio Aguilera
  • , Andres M. Rubiano
  • , Caridad Soler Morejon
  • , Manuel Jibaja
  • , Hubiel Lopez
  • , Ricardo Romero
  • , Sureyya Dikmen
  • , Kelley Chaddock
  • Randall M. Chesnut*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Washington
  • National Hospital Alejandro Posadas
  • Hospital de Emergencias Dr. Clemente Alvarez
  • Hospital Privado de Rosario
  • Hospital Erasmo Meoz ICU #1
  • Hospital Municipal de Urgencias
  • Sanatorio Pasteur, Argentina
  • Lucero Hospital
  • Hospital Obrero No. 1
  • Hospital Regional
  • Universidad El Bosque
  • Ameijeiras Hospital
  • Hospital Eugenio Espejo
  • Hospital General de la Plaza de la Salud
  • Fundación Clinica Campbell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) is a significant global health problem disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Management of intracranial hypertension in sTBI is crucial to survival and optimal recovery. Practitioners in high-income countries routinely use intracranial pressure (ICP) monitors although their usefulness has been questioned. ICP monitors are usually unavailable in LMICs. No consensus-based/tested protocols or literature exists for sTBI treatment without ICP monitoring. Methods Investigators developed serial SurveyMonkey surveys for Latin American neurointensivists and neurosurgeons to determine current practice. These clinicians had extensive routine ongoing experience in sTBI without ICP monitoring. Surveys were administered and analyzed before/during/after a 2015 Buenos Aires consensus conference. Investigators identified areas of convergence blinded from colleagues’ responses. A 47-clinician task force, representing 15 countries, who routinely manage patients with sTBI without monitors developed consensus-based treatment guidelines during a 3-day facilitated conference. Results Elements were added to the protocol at an 80% agreement threshold. Follow-on surveys resolved remaining elements to 97% agreement. The protocol addresses both tapering (on improvement) and neuroworsening. Staged treatment options were identified, plus unique clinical practice issues. This process introduced a research method to a large multidisciplinary group of LMIC clinicians. This report describes the process used to develop an LMIC-specific protocol that is transferable to other diseases/injuries. The protocol is being tested in 5 LMICs. Conclusions We derived consensus-based guidelines for sTBI treatment without ICP monitoring, and introduced a research method to a large multidisciplinary group of LMIC clinicians naive to such methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e952-e957
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume110
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2018
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Consensus treatment protocol
  • Global health
  • Intracranial hypertension
  • Intracranial pressure monitoring
  • Neurocritical care
  • Severe traumatic brain injury

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Development of a Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Consensus-Based Treatment Protocol Conference in Latin America'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this