Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Diel and Artificial Light Effects on Nearshore Communities Revealed by eDNA Metabarcoding

  • Kingsly Chuo Beng*
  • , Gledis Guri
  • , Yin Cheong Aden Ip
  • , Pedro F.P. Brandão-Dias
  • , Elizabeth Andruszkiewicz Allan
  • , Diana A. Pazmiño
  • , Adam Brink
  • , Mei Hong Zhao
  • , Muhammad Danie Al Malik
  • , Fraulein Jan O. Calumpiano
  • , Natalie A. Sawaya
  • , Ouattara Koffi Nouho
  • , Abahi Koudjodé Simon
  • , Florencia Bertoglio
  • , Suzana de Moura Pereira
  • , Yingbei Peng
  • , Melvie Aulya
  • , Marianela Veyñ
  • , Ryan P. Kelly
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries
  • Helmholtz Institute for Functional Marine Biodiversity at the University of Oldenburg (HIFMB)
  • Alfred Wegener Institute - Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • University of Washington
  • MigraMar
  • Florida Atlantic University
  • Hong Kong Baptist University
  • Universitas Diponegoro
  • University of the Philippines
  • University of Alaska Fairbanks
  • Universite d'Abobo-Adjame
  • Université de Parakou
  • Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Fisiología y Evolución de Organismos Acuáticos (LEFyE)
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Changes in natural and artificial light presumably have dramatic influences on ecological communities, yet measuring these effects can be challenging due to the difficulty in distinguishing ecological signals from background variability. Here, we used environmental DNA (eDNA) to test for light-associated changes in a nearshore marine community. Over 8 days at Friday Harbor Laboratories, Washington, USA, we sampled seawater at midday and midnight with and without an artificial light treatment, analyzing a total of 84 samples (3 L triplicate samples) using COI and 12S markers on an Oxford Nanopore MinION platform. We detected 229 eukaryotic (COI) and 77 vertebrate (12S) taxa across 11 trophic groups, dominated by primary producers (89 species), benthic invertebrates, and fishes. Metabarcoding captured community restructuring within 30 min, such that we could observe meaningful effects of artificial light treatments at night (particularly among spawning polychaetes), as well as more fundamental community shifts in day vs. night (e.g., with primary producers, gelatinous zooplankton, and filter feeders more common during the day). These techniques offer a means of near-real-time assessment of wholescale changes in ecological communities, and our results here illustrate species- and group-specific effects of light levels that are likely important in structuring nearshore marine communities worldwide.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere70334
JournalEnvironmental DNA
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jul 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • artificial illumination
  • coastal ecosystem
  • diel dynamics
  • light pollution
  • nanopore sequencing
  • nearshore communities
  • temporal turnover

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Diel and Artificial Light Effects on Nearshore Communities Revealed by eDNA Metabarcoding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this