Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Different low constant flows can equally determine the lower inflection point in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients

  • Ana Maria Casati Nogueira Gama
  • , Eduardo Correa Meyer
  • , Ana Maria Araújo Silva Gaudêncio
  • , Michelle Andrade Grunauer
  • , Marcelo Britto Passos Amato
  • , Carlos Roberto Ribeiro De Carvalho
  • , Carmen Sílvia Valente Barbas*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Universidade de São Paulo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Among the possible techniques to obtain the pressure-volume (P × V) curve at the bedside the low constant flow (CF) is the easiest and quickest one. However, the best value for CF to perform a good semi-static P × V curve is still to be determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of 4 different CFs (1, 2, 5, and 10 L/min) on determination of lower inflection point of the P × V curve (L-Pflex) and upper inflection point of the P × V curve (U-Pflex) on the maximum slope and on the inspiratory work of breathing (up to volume of 1.35 L; inspiratory work L/cm H2O), comparing the volume estimated from the CF with the measured volume obtained by the respiratory inductive plethysmograph. The design was a prospective study, and the setting was an adult medical intensive care unit of a university hospital. There were 7 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, less than 5 days of installation, after the standardization of lung volume history received sequentially from 4 different low inspiratory CFs in 2 trials. The P × V curve lasted from 73 ± 1.6 s (1 L/min) to 8.8 ± 0.69 s (10 L/min). The L-Pflex differed in the 2 performed trials (p = 0.04). There was no difference of L-Pflex among the 4 CFs comparing the 3 methods (p = 0.072) used for its calculation as well as comparing the estimated and the measured volume (p = 0.456). The maximum slope decreased significantly while increasing the flow from 1 to 10 L/min just in the estimated volume (p = 0.03). The inspiratory work did not increase with the increment of the flow either in the estimated volume (p = 0.217) or in the measured volume (p = 0.149). The U-Pflex differed among the trials (p = 0.003) and the methods used for its calculation (p < 0.01). Constant flows from 1 to 10 L/min can equally determine L-Pflex in ARDS patients and is an easy and quick way to obtain the L-Pflex in order to optimize positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) in ARDS patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)882-889
Number of pages8
JournalArtificial Organs
Volume25
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Acute respiratory distress syndrome
  • Constant flow technique
  • Mechanical ventilation
  • Pflex
  • Positive end expiratory pressure
  • Pressure-volume curves

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Different low constant flows can equally determine the lower inflection point in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this