Abstract
Neo-Walrasian conceptualizations and DSGE models are incompatible with the emergence of coordination and discoordination in economic activity. While many conceptualizations stemming from the Austrian tradition are generally consistent with these fundamental problems, their process driven approach is hampered by the use of equilibrium constructs. This paper argues for the adoption of formal models that avoid this problem by addressing the following questions. Why should Austrian macroeconomists model? Where do models fit in with respect to pure and applied theory? How to model without equilibrium? To answer this final question I present a structure that aids in the construction and communication of such models.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 51-82 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Review of Austrian Economics |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1 Mar 2017 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Agent based computational economics
- Coordination
- Economic methodology
- Neo Austrian
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic coordinating non-equilibrium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver