ENVISAGER L’ANIMAL Dés-ontologiser l’anthropologie de l’altérité

Julián García Labrador; Stéphane Vinolo

doi:10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.3119

ENVISAGER L’ANIMAL Dés-ontologiser l’anthropologie de l’altérité

Translated title of the contribution: Viewing the animal De-ontologizing the anthropology of otherness

Julián García Labrador
, Stéphane Vinolo

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador Sede Manabi

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Contemporary anthropology has experienced an ontological turn and therefore a reconfiguration of many of its concepts. Yet the authors show that because ontology keeps thinking otherness as a category, the limits of alterity cannot be extended as far as they should. Through the phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion, it is possible to think otherness and its counter-intentionality not as a type of phenomenon, always already limited because of its constitution by a transcendental subject, but as a possible interpretation of any phenomenon, as long as the subject accepts its givenness. Thus, otherness does not have to be described but declared.

Translated title of the contribution	Viewing the animal De-ontologizing the anthropology of otherness
Original language	French
Pages (from-to)	167-181
Number of pages	15
Journal	VISUAL Review. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura
Volume	9
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.3119
State	Published - 14 Jan 2022

Keywords

Counter-intentionality
Gaze
Hermeneutics
Ontological Turn
Otherness
Phenomenology

Access to Document

10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.3119

Cite this

@article{9b0c343169a347b7a9599ab041fe1a9d,

title = "ENVISAGER L{\textquoteright}ANIMAL D{\'e}s-ontologiser l{\textquoteright}anthropologie de l{\textquoteright}alt{\'e}rit{\'e}",

abstract = "Contemporary anthropology has experienced an ontological turn and therefore a reconfiguration of many of its concepts. Yet the authors show that because ontology keeps thinking otherness as a category, the limits of alterity cannot be extended as far as they should. Through the phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion, it is possible to think otherness and its counter-intentionality not as a type of phenomenon, always already limited because of its constitution by a transcendental subject, but as a possible interpretation of any phenomenon, as long as the subject accepts its givenness. Thus, otherness does not have to be described but declared.",

keywords = "Counter-intentionality, Gaze, Hermeneutics, Ontological Turn, Otherness, Phenomenology",

author = "Labrador, \{Juli{\'a}n Garc{\'i}a\} and St{\'e}phane Vinolo",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Global Knowledge Academics.",

year = "2022",

month = jan,

day = "14",

doi = "10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.3119",

language = "Franc{\'e}s",

volume = "9",

pages = "167--181",

journal = "VISUAL Review. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura",

issn = "2695-9631",

publisher = "VisualCOM Scientific Publications",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - ENVISAGER L’ANIMAL Dés-ontologiser l’anthropologie de l’altérité

AU - Labrador, Julián García

AU - Vinolo, Stéphane

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Global Knowledge Academics.

PY - 2022/1/14

Y1 - 2022/1/14

N2 - Contemporary anthropology has experienced an ontological turn and therefore a reconfiguration of many of its concepts. Yet the authors show that because ontology keeps thinking otherness as a category, the limits of alterity cannot be extended as far as they should. Through the phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion, it is possible to think otherness and its counter-intentionality not as a type of phenomenon, always already limited because of its constitution by a transcendental subject, but as a possible interpretation of any phenomenon, as long as the subject accepts its givenness. Thus, otherness does not have to be described but declared.

AB - Contemporary anthropology has experienced an ontological turn and therefore a reconfiguration of many of its concepts. Yet the authors show that because ontology keeps thinking otherness as a category, the limits of alterity cannot be extended as far as they should. Through the phenomenology of Jean-Luc Marion, it is possible to think otherness and its counter-intentionality not as a type of phenomenon, always already limited because of its constitution by a transcendental subject, but as a possible interpretation of any phenomenon, as long as the subject accepts its givenness. Thus, otherness does not have to be described but declared.

KW - Counter-intentionality

KW - Gaze

KW - Hermeneutics

KW - Ontological Turn

KW - Otherness

KW - Phenomenology

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85127776897

U2 - 10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.3119

DO - 10.37467/gkarevvisual.v9.3119

M3 - Artículo

AN - SCOPUS:85127776897

SN - 2695-9631

VL - 9

SP - 167

EP - 181

JO - VISUAL Review. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura

JF - VISUAL Review. International Visual Culture Review / Revista Internacional de Cultura

IS - 1

ER -

ENVISAGER L’ANIMAL Dés-ontologiser l’anthropologie de l’altérité

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this