Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Forecasting annual geophysical time series

  • Donald J. Noakes*
  • , Keith W. Hipel
  • , A. Ian McLeod
  • , Carlos Jimenez
  • , Sidney Yakowitz
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Pacific Biological Station, Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  • University of Waterloo
  • Western University
  • University of Arizona

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

An important test of the adequecy of a stochastic model is its ability to forecast accurately. In hydrology as in many other disciplines, the performance of the model in producing one step ahead forecasts is of particular interest. The ability of several stationary nonseasonal time series models to produce accurate forecasts is examined in this paper. Statistical tests are employed to determine if the forecasts generated by a particular model are better than the forecasts produced by an alternative procedure. The results of the study indicate that for the data sets examined, there is no significant difference in forecast performance between the nonseasonal autoregressive moving average model and a nonparametric regression model.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)103-115
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of Forecasting
Volume4
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • ARMA
  • Forecasting
  • Fractional ARMA
  • Fractional Gaussian noise
  • Fractional differencing

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Forecasting annual geophysical time series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this