Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Government policy, clean fuel access, and persistent fuel stacking in Ecuador

  • Carlos F. Gould*
  • , Samuel Schlesinger
  • , Andres Ochoa Toasa
  • , Mark Thurber
  • , William F. Waters
  • , Jay P. Graham
  • , Darby W. Jack
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health
  • Independent Consultant
  • Columbia University
  • Walsh Environmental Scientists and Engineers
  • Public Health Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

96 Scopus citations

Abstract

After more than three decades of access to low-cost liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) financed by large direct government subsidies, >90% of Ecuadorian households cook primarily with LPG. Due to the large fiscal burden of the LPG subsidy, increases in electricity from hydropower, and other socio-political factors, the Government of Ecuador has launched a major induction stove program (PEC) to reduce the demand for LPG. We assess the effects of the LPG subsidies and PEC using government records, interviews, academic literature, newspaper reports, household surveys, and focus groups. Household surveys, conducted in rural, northern Ecuadorian households (n = 383), characterized cooking patterns and fuel access. Focus groups (n = 6) were carried out with a subset of surveyed households to better characterize survey findings. The LPG subsidy was developed as part of broad social support reforms in the early 1970s, without specific aims to reduce the health impacts of household air pollution from woodfuel or provide economic benefits as part of the transition to a clean cooking fuel. Nonetheless, the subsidy has resulted in nearly all Ecuadorian households cooking primarily with LPG. PEC has generated the sale of 740,000 induction stoves since its inception in 2014, short of the goal of 3.5 million. Among the rural households surveyed, LPG use, acceptance, and satisfaction was high, however, more than three-quarters of those surveyed reported weekly woodfuel use. Induction stove ownership (17%) and use as a primary cooking fuel (1%) was low among the rural households surveyed; furthermore, households owning induction stoves reported very low satisfaction with the stoves. Here we show that nationally-representative surveys reporting only “primary cooking fuel” use may underestimate solid fuel use as a supplemental household cooking energy, particularly in rural areas where fuel availability issues play a stronger role in decisions about what fuels to use.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)111-122
Number of pages12
JournalEnergy for Sustainable Development
Volume46
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

Keywords

  • Energy transitions
  • Fuel stacking
  • Induction stoves
  • Liquefied petroleum gas
  • National program
  • Subsidies

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Government policy, clean fuel access, and persistent fuel stacking in Ecuador'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this