Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Humpback whales interfering when mammal-eating killer whales attack other species: Mobbing behavior and interspecific altruism?

  • Robert L. Pitman*
  • , Volker B. Deecke
  • , Christine M. Gabriele
  • , Mridula Srinivasan
  • , Nancy Black
  • , Judith Denkinger
  • , John W. Durban
  • , Elizabeth A. Mathews
  • , Dena R. Matkin
  • , Janet L. Neilson
  • , Alisa Schulman-Janiger
  • , Debra Shearwater
  • , Peggy Stap
  • , Richard Ternullo
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • University of Cumbria
  • U.S. Department of the Interior
  • National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
  • California Killer Whale Project
  • North Gulf Oceanic Society
  • California Killer Whale Project
  • Shearwater Journeys, Inc.
  • Marine Life Studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

80 Scopus citations

Abstract

Humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) are known to interfere with attacking killer whales (Orcinus orca). To investigate why, we reviewed accounts of 115 interactions between them. Humpbacks initiated the majority of interactions (57% vs. 43%; n = 72), although the killer whales were almost exclusively mammal-eating forms (MEKWs, 95%) vs. fish-eaters (5%; n = 108). When MEKWs approached humpbacks (n = 27), they attacked 85% of the time and targeted only calves. When humpbacks approached killer whales (n = 41), 93% were MEKWs, and ≥87% of them were attacking or feeding on prey at the time. When humpbacks interacted with attacking MEKWs, 11% of the prey were humpbacks and 89% comprised 10 other species, including three cetaceans, six pinnipeds, and one teleost fish. Approaching humpbacks often harassed attacking MEKWs (≥55% of 56 interactions), regardless of the prey species, which we argue was mobbing behavior. Humpback mobbing sometimes allowed MEKW prey, including nonhumpbacks, to escape. We suggest that humpbacks initially responded to vocalizations of attacking MEKWs without knowing the prey species targeted. Although reciprocity or kin selection might explain communal defense of conspecific calves, there was no apparent benefit to humpbacks continuing to interfere when other species were being attacked. Interspecific altruism, even if unintentional, could not be ruled out.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-58
Number of pages52
JournalMarine Mammal Science
Volume33
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2017

Keywords

  • Megaptera novaeangliae
  • Orcinus orca
  • humpback whale
  • interspecific altruism
  • killer whale
  • mobbing behavior
  • predation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Humpback whales interfering when mammal-eating killer whales attack other species: Mobbing behavior and interspecific altruism?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this