Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Imaging criteria across pivotal randomized controlled trials for late window thrombectomy patient selection

  • Bijoy K. Menon
  • , Johanna Maria Ospel
  • , Ryan A. McTaggart
  • , Raul G. Nogueira
  • , Andrew M. Demchuk
  • , Alexandre Poppe
  • , Jeremy L. Rempel
  • , Charlotte Zerna
  • , Manish Joshi
  • , Mohammed A. Almekhlafi
  • , Thalia S. Field
  • , Dariush Dowlatshahi
  • , Brian Anthony Van Adel
  • , Eric Sauvageau
  • , Jason Tarpley
  • , Tiago Moreira
  • , Oh Young Bang
  • , Don Heck
  • , Marios N. Psychogios
  • , Michael Tymianski
  • Michael D. Hill, Mayank Goyal*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Basel
  • Brown University Warren Alpert Medical School
  • Emory University
  • University of Montreal
  • University of Alberta
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Ottawa
  • Western University
  • Baptist Hospital
  • Saint John's Health Center
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan university
  • Forsyth Medical Center
  • NoNO Inc.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background The DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials showed the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting beyond 6 hours from last known well (LKW) and selected by perfusion imaging criteria. The ESCAPE NA1-trial selected patients based on non-contrast CT (NCCT) Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) and multiphase CT angiography (CTA) collateral status. This study compares baseline characteristics, workflow, and outcomes in the EVT arms of DAWN and DEFUSE-3 with late-window patients from the EVT-only arm of ESCAPE-NA1. Methods Aggregate data on baseline characteristics, workflow, reperfusion quality, final infarct volume, and clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Score [mRS] at 90 days) in subjects enrolled in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 EVT arms were compared with similar data from the ESCAPE-NA1 control arm (EVT-only arm) presenting beyond 6 hours from LKW using descriptive statistics. Results Baseline characteristics among late-window patients in the ESCAPE NA1 trial were similar to those in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 EVT arms. Median time from LKW-to-puncture in subjects enrolled in the ESCAPE NA1 trial was 9 hrs (IQR: 7.5-11 hours) when compared with DAWN (n=107; 12.8 hours, IQR: 10.6-16.7 hours) and DEFUSE-3 (n=92; 11.5 hours, IQR: 9.2-12.8 hours). Median post-treatment infarct-volume was largest in the ESCAPE NA1-patients (47 mL [IQR: 19-146] vs median 8 mL [IQR: 0-48] in the DAWN group and 35 mL [IQR: 18-82] in DEFUSE-3), while % mRS 0-2 at 90 days were similar across the three trials (ESCAPE NA1: 50/111 [45%], DAWN: 52/107 [49%], DEFUSE-3: 41/92 [45%]). Conclusion Patients enrolled beyond 6 hours from LKW in the ESCAPE-NA1 trial based on NCCT-ASPECTS and mCTA had similar clinical outcomes when compared with patients selected by perfusion imaging in the DAWN and DEFUSE-3 trials.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)985-989
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume13
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • CT
  • CT angiography
  • CT perfusion
  • stroke

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Imaging criteria across pivotal randomized controlled trials for late window thrombectomy patient selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this