Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Incident prescriptions for common cardiovascular medications: comparison of recent versus pre-2020 medication adherence and discontinuation in three universal health care systems

  • Candace D. McNaughton*
  • , Peter C. Austin
  • , Cynthia A. Jackevicius
  • , Anna Chu
  • , Jessalyn K. Holodinsky
  • , Michael D. Hill
  • , Colleen M. Norris
  • , Mukesh Kumar
  • , Noreen Kamal
  • , Douglas S. Lee
  • , Nadia Khan
  • , Manav V. Vyas
  • , Raed A. Joundi
  • , Moira K. Kapral
  • , Amy Y.X. Yu
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences
  • University of Toronto
  • University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
  • Western University of Health Sciences
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Alberta
  • Dalhousie University
  • Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research
  • University Health Network and Mount Sinai Hospital
  • University of British Columbia
  • Population Health Research Institute, Ontario

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Health system disruptions since onset of the COVID-19 pandemic may have adversely impacted adherence to medications for common cardiovascular risk factors. Methods We examined adherence to and discontinuation of incident prescriptions for medications treating hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and atrial fibrillation in Ontario, Alberta, and Nova Scotia, Canada. We compared the recent period (April 1, 2020 through most recently available follow-up: September 30, 2021 for Ontario; March 31, 2021 for Alberta; and March 31, 2022 for Nova Scotia) to the baseline, pre-pandemic period (April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2019). In each province, people aged ≥66 years with a valid health number and corresponding incident prescription were included. For each medication class, adherence in the recent period, defined as ≥ 0.80 proportion-of-days-covered (PDC), was compared to the pre-pandemic period using modified Poisson regression with robust error variance, adjusted for patient characteristics. Similarly adjusted Cox proportional hazards models compared hazard of discontinuation over one year of follow-up between the two time periods. Results In the recent period, PDC ranged from 48.9% for dyslipidemia medications in Alberta to 82.2% for anticoagulants in Nova Scotia. Adherence was not different between periods, with the following exceptions: higher adherence in the recent period for antihypertensives (adjusted risk ratios [aRR] 1.08, 95% CI 1.06–1.10) and dyslipidemics (aRR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04–1.09) in Nova Scotia, and for antihyperglycemics (aRR 1.10, 95% CI 1.08– 1.14) and anticoagulants (1.15, 95% CI 1.12, 1.18) in Alberta. Adherence was lower in the recent period only for antihypertensives in Alberta (aRR 0.95, 95% CI 0.93, 0.97). One-year rates of discontinuation ranged from 20.9% for anticoagulants in the Alberta recent period to 56.7% for antihypertensives in the Ontario baseline period. The adjusted hazard of discontinuation was lower or unchanged in the recent period for all medication classes. Conclusions Despite significant health system disruptions since 2020, recent adherence to incident cardiovascular prescriptions was similar or better than before and rates of medication discontinuation were lower. However, interventions are still needed to improve existing, suboptimal adherence.

Original languageEnglish
Article number82
JournalBMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Atrial fibrillation
  • Cardiovascular risk factors
  • Diabetes
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Healthcare delivery
  • Hypertension
  • Medication adherence
  • Medication discontinuation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Incident prescriptions for common cardiovascular medications: comparison of recent versus pre-2020 medication adherence and discontinuation in three universal health care systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this