Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Position Paper: Key considerations to support evidence-based cell and gene therapies and oppose marketing of unproven products

  • ISCT Committee on the Ethics of Cell and Gene Therapy (ECGT)
  • State University of New York at Buffalo
  • Servicio Andaluz de Salud
  • AdBio Partners
  • Methodist Hospital
  • Baylor College of Medicine
  • Georgia Institute of Technology
  • University of Melbourne
  • Murdoch Children's Research Institute
  • The University of Sydney
  • The University of Sydney
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • University of California at Irvine
  • Academic Center for Education
  • University of Verona
  • International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy
  • Christian Medical College
  • University of Vermont
  • The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
  • University of Pennsylvania

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

The field of regenerative medicine, including cellular immunotherapies, is on a remarkable growth trajectory. Dozens of cell-, tissue- and gene-based products have received marketing authorization worldwide while hundreds-to-thousands are either in preclinical development or under clinical investigation in phased clinical trials. However, the promise of regenerative therapies has also given rise to a global industry of direct-to-consumer offerings of prematurely commercialized cell and cell-based products with unknown safety and efficacy profiles. Since its inception, the International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Committee on the Ethics of Cell and Gene Therapy has opposed the premature commercialization of unproven cell- and gene-based interventions and supported the development of evidence-based advanced therapy products. In the present Guide, targeted at International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy members, we analyze this industry, focusing in particular on distinctive features of unproven cell and cell-based products and the use of tokens of scientific legitimacy as persuasive marketing devices. We also provide an overview of reporting mechanisms for patients who believe they have been harmed by administration of unapproved and unproven products and suggest practical strategies to address the direct-to-consumer marketing of such products. Development of this Guide epitomizes our continued support for the ethical and rigorous development of cell and cell-based products with patient safety and therapeutic benefit as guiding principles.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)920-929
Number of pages10
JournalCytotherapy
Volume25
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2023
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • cell and gene therapies (CGTs)
  • regulatory agencies
  • reporting mechanisms
  • tokens of scientific legitimacy
  • unproven cell and gene interventions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Position Paper: Key considerations to support evidence-based cell and gene therapies and oppose marketing of unproven products'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this