Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is noxious stimulus-evoked electroencephalography response a reliable, valid, and interpretable outcome measure to assess analgesic efficacy in neonates? A systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis protocol

  • INC Pain Working Group
  • University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division
  • John Radcliffe Hospital
  • Pelita Harapan University
  • KU Leuven
  • Erasmus MC
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • University of Liverpool
  • University of Utah School of Medicine
  • Pfizer
  • Children’s National Hospital
  • U. S. Food and Drug Administration
  • Data Collaboration Center (DCC)
  • Inc

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: There are several major challenges limiting our ability to test analgesic efficacy for treatment of neonatal pain, and progress in analgesic drug studies in neonates has stalled. One significant issue is the reliance of clinical pain assessments on traditional behavioural and vital signs-based measures and the exclusion of novel brain-based biomarkers. In this review protocol, we outline our strategy to assess the reliability, validity, and interpretability of an electroencephalography (EEG)-based response biomarker for assessment of acute somatic nociceptive pain in neonates. Methods: To standardise EEG analysis and generate the outcome of interest, we will perform an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis using data from neonates aged 34–44-week postmenstrual age that have had EEG recorded during acute somatic nociceptive skin-breaking procedures. Relevant data from both published and grey literature will be identified by searching six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar), two clinical trial registry platforms (ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP), and by consulting expert opinion. We will assess availability bias, data accuracy, and data quality by cross-referencing provided data with data descriptions in the literature, identifying duplicates and nonsensical values, and extracting quality control metrics. Data will be synthesised via a two-stage IPD meta-analysis using a random effects modelling approach grouped by site. Reliability (inter- and intra-rater) outcomes will be measured as Gwet’s AC1 coefficient. Validity (known-groups and known-stimuli) outcomes will be measured as EEG response magnitude differences between clinically meaningfully different stimuli. Interpretability will be addressed by providing normative values, in both original and standardised units. Discussion: The purpose of this study is to establish the reliability, validity, and interpretability of a specific EEG-based response biomarker for assessing acute somatic nociceptive pain in neonates. It will provide an overview of available data and how EEG is being used globally to assess acute neonatal pain. If sufficient IPD are made available and the outcome is reliable, valid, and interpretable, this work will support the use of EEG-based outcome measures as primary endpoints in clinical trials assessing analgesic efficacy in neonates. Systematic review registration: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO on 14 July 2023: CRD42023444809.

Original languageEnglish
Article number152
JournalSystematic Reviews
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2025

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Brain
  • Electroencephalography
  • Individual participant data
  • Interpretability
  • Meta-analysis
  • Neonate
  • Pain
  • Reliability
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is noxious stimulus-evoked electroencephalography response a reliable, valid, and interpretable outcome measure to assess analgesic efficacy in neonates? A systematic review and individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis protocol'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this