Abstract
The expansion of mining in Ecuador has stirred resistance among some Indigenous peasant communities in the name of territorial rights; others have offered their land and labour to mining companies. In this and similar land grab contexts, Indigenous peasant communities are often broadly represented as natural resisters or as corrupted collaborators, which, we argue, does not account for how peasants with territorial and/or land rights weigh their options. In Napo province, we examine how peasants have adjudicated contradictory socioeconomic pressures and, in turn, opted to work with miners. We highlight the methodological and political implications of centering how local ‘participants’ in land grabs experience untenable choices or ‘double binds’ to understand the efficacy of land grabs and the obstacles to resistance.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e12612 |
| Journal | Journal of Agrarian Change |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Keywords
- Amazon
- Ecuador
- double bind
- land grab
- land rights
- mining
- territorial rights
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Land Grab Double Binds: Peasant Farmers and/in the Ecuadorian Mining Boom'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver