Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review

  • Ryan T. Muir
  • , Michael D. Hill
  • , Sandra E. Black
  • , Eric E. Smith*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Toronto

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

71 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a rapid systematic review of minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial endpoints. METHODS: Two reviewers searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed from inception to June 4, 2023. RESULTS: Ten articles were retrieved. For mild cognitive impairment (MCI), a change of +2 to +3 points on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), +1 points on the Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes (CDR-SB), −5 points on the integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), or −1 to −2 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was considered meaningful. For patients with mild AD, a change of +3 on the ADAS-Cog, +2 points on CDR-SB, −9 points on the iADRS, or −2 points on the MMSE was considered meaningful. For patients with moderate to severe AD, a change of +2 points on the CDR-SB or a change of −1.4 to −3 points on the MMSE was considered meaningful. CONCLUSION: This review identified previously published MCIDs for AD trial endpoints. Input from patients and caregivers will be needed to derive more meaningful endpoints and thresholds. Highlights: This systematic rapid review identified thresholds for minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for recently used Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial endpoints: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Clinical Dementia Rating scale sum of boxes (CDR-SB), integrated Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (iADRS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). MCIDs were higher for more severe stages of AD. Average treatment effects in recent trials of anti-amyloid disease modifying monoclonal antibodies are lower than previously published MCIDs. In future trials of disease modifying treatments for AD, the proportion of participants in each treatment group that experienced a clinically meaningful decline could be reported. More work is needed to incorporate the values and preferences of patients and care partners in deriving MCIDs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3352-3363
Number of pages12
JournalAlzheimer's and Dementia
Volume20
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Alzheimer's disease
  • clinical trial
  • minimal clinically important difference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Minimal clinically important difference in Alzheimer's disease: Rapid review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this