TY - JOUR
T1 - Organizational issues, structure, and processes of care in 257 ICUs in Latin America
T2 - A study from the Latin America intensive care network
AU - Estenssoro, Elisa
AU - Alegría, Leyla
AU - Murias, Gastón
AU - Friedman, Gilberto
AU - Castro, Ricardo
AU - Nin Vaeza, Nicolas
AU - Loudet, Cecilia
AU - Bruhn, Alejandro
AU - Jibaja, Manuel
AU - Ospina-Tascon, Gustavo
AU - Ríos, Fernando
AU - Machado, Flavia R.
AU - Biasi Cavalcanti, Alexandre
AU - Dubin, Arnaldo
AU - Hurtado, F. Javier
AU - Briva, Arturo
AU - Romero, Carlos
AU - Bugedo, Guillermo
AU - Bakker, Jan
AU - Cecconi, Maurizio
AU - Azevedo, Luciano
AU - Hernandez, Glenn
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2017 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - Objective: Latin America bears an important burden of critical care disease, yet the information about it is scarce. Our objective was to describe structure, organization, processes of care, and research activities in Latin-American ICUs. Design: Web-based survey submitted to ICU directors. Settings: ICUs located in nine Latin-American countries. Subjects: Individual ICUs. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Two hundred fifty-seven of 498 (52%) of submitted surveys responded: 51% from Brazil, 17% Chile, 13% Argentina, 6% Ecuador, 5% Uruguay, 3% Colombia, and 5% between Mexico, Peru, and Paraguay. Seventy-nine percent of participating hospitals had less than 500 beds; most were public (59%) and academic (66%). ICUs were mainly medical-surgical (75%); number of beds was evenly distributed in the entire cohort; 77% had 24/7 intensivists; 46% had a physician-to-patient ratio between 1:4 and 7; and 69% had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1 ≥ 2.1. The 24/7 presence of other specialists was deficient. Protocols in use averaged 9 ± 3. Brazil (vs the rest) had larger hospitals and ICUs and more quality, surveillance, and prevention committees, but fewer 24/7 intensivists and poorer nurse-to-patient ratio. Although standard monitoring, laboratory, and imaging practices were almost universal, more complex measurements and treatments and portable equipment were scarce after standard working hours, and in public hospitals. Mortality was 17.8%, without differences between countries. Conclusions: This multinational study shows major concerns in the delivery of critical care across Latin America, particularly in human resources. Technology was suboptimal, especially in public hospitals. A 24/7 availability of supporting specialists and of key procedures was inadequate. Mortality was high in comparison to high-income countries.
AB - Objective: Latin America bears an important burden of critical care disease, yet the information about it is scarce. Our objective was to describe structure, organization, processes of care, and research activities in Latin-American ICUs. Design: Web-based survey submitted to ICU directors. Settings: ICUs located in nine Latin-American countries. Subjects: Individual ICUs. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Two hundred fifty-seven of 498 (52%) of submitted surveys responded: 51% from Brazil, 17% Chile, 13% Argentina, 6% Ecuador, 5% Uruguay, 3% Colombia, and 5% between Mexico, Peru, and Paraguay. Seventy-nine percent of participating hospitals had less than 500 beds; most were public (59%) and academic (66%). ICUs were mainly medical-surgical (75%); number of beds was evenly distributed in the entire cohort; 77% had 24/7 intensivists; 46% had a physician-to-patient ratio between 1:4 and 7; and 69% had a nurse-to-patient ratio of 1 ≥ 2.1. The 24/7 presence of other specialists was deficient. Protocols in use averaged 9 ± 3. Brazil (vs the rest) had larger hospitals and ICUs and more quality, surveillance, and prevention committees, but fewer 24/7 intensivists and poorer nurse-to-patient ratio. Although standard monitoring, laboratory, and imaging practices were almost universal, more complex measurements and treatments and portable equipment were scarce after standard working hours, and in public hospitals. Mortality was 17.8%, without differences between countries. Conclusions: This multinational study shows major concerns in the delivery of critical care across Latin America, particularly in human resources. Technology was suboptimal, especially in public hospitals. A 24/7 availability of supporting specialists and of key procedures was inadequate. Mortality was high in comparison to high-income countries.
KW - Latin America
KW - health services research
KW - intensive care unit staffing
KW - nurse staffing
KW - physician-to-patient ratio
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85018796463&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002413
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002413
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 28437376
AN - SCOPUS:85018796463
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 45
SP - 1325
EP - 1336
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 8
ER -