Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of COVID-19: a modelling study

  • Marius Gilbert
  • , Giulia Pullano
  • , Francesco Pinotti
  • , Eugenio Valdano
  • , Chiara Poletto
  • , Pierre Yves Boëlle
  • , Eric D'Ortenzio
  • , Yazdan Yazdanpanah
  • , Serge Paul Eholie
  • , Mathias Altmann
  • , Bernardo Gutierrez
  • , Moritz U.G. Kraemer
  • , Vittoria Colizza*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles
  • Belgian National Fund for Scientific Research
  • Universite Pierre et Marie Curie
  • Sociology and Economics of Networks and Services Laboratory at Orange Experience Design Laboratory Chatillion
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Université Paris Cité
  • Bichat Hospital
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Treichville
  • Université Félix Houphouët-Boigny Cocody-Abidjan
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • Université de Bordeaux
  • University of Oxford
  • Harvard University
  • Boston Children's Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

837 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has spread from China to 25 countries. Local cycles of transmission have already occurred in 12 countries after case importation. In Africa, Egypt has so far confirmed one case. The management and control of COVID-19 importations heavily rely on a country's health capacity. Here we evaluate the preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against their risk of importation of COVID-19. Methods: We used data on the volume of air travel departing from airports in the infected provinces in China and directed to Africa to estimate the risk of importation per country. We determined the country's capacity to detect and respond to cases with two indicators: preparedness, using the WHO International Health Regulations Monitoring and Evaluation Framework; and vulnerability, using the Infectious Disease Vulnerability Index. Countries were clustered according to the Chinese regions contributing most to their risk. Findings: Countries with the highest importation risk (ie, Egypt, Algeria, and South Africa) have moderate to high capacity to respond to outbreaks. Countries at moderate risk (ie, Nigeria, Ethiopia, Sudan, Angola, Tanzania, Ghana, and Kenya) have variable capacity and high vulnerability. We identified three clusters of countries that share the same exposure to the risk originating from the provinces of Guangdong, Fujian, and the city of Beijing, respectively. Interpretation: Many countries in Africa are stepping up their preparedness to detect and cope with COVID-19 importations. Resources, intensified surveillance, and capacity building should be urgently prioritised in countries with moderate risk that might be ill-prepared to detect imported cases and to limit onward transmission. Funding: EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation Horizon 2020, Agence Nationale de la Recherche.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)871-877
Number of pages7
JournalThe Lancet
Volume395
Issue number10227
DOIs
StatePublished - 14 Mar 2020
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Preparedness and vulnerability of African countries against importations of COVID-19: a modelling study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this