Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 - Blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk

  • Raj S. Padwal*
  • , Brenda R. Hemmelgarn
  • , Finlay A. McAlister
  • , Donald W. McKay
  • , Steven Grover
  • , Thomas Wilson
  • , Brian Penner
  • , Ellen Burgess
  • , Peter Bolli
  • , Michael Hill
  • , Jeff Mahon
  • , Martin G. Myers
  • , Carl Abbott
  • , Ernesto L. Schiffrin
  • , George Honos
  • , Karen Mann
  • , Guy Tremblay
  • , Alain Milot
  • , Lyne Cloutier
  • , Arun Chockalingam
  • Nadia A. Khan, Simon W. Rabkin, Martin Dawes, Rhian M. Touyz, Sheldon W. Tobe
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Alberta
  • University of Calgary
  • Memorial University of Newfoundland
  • McGill University
  • University of Saskatchewan
  • University of Manitoba
  • Ambulatory Internal Medicine Teaching Clinic
  • Western University
  • University of Toronto
  • QEII Health Sciences Centre
  • McGill University
  • Dalhousie University
  • Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval
  • Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
  • Simon Fraser University
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension. Options and outcomes: The diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on the appropriate measurement of blood pressure, the timely assessment of serially elevated readings, the degree of blood pressure elevation, the method of measurement (office, ambulatory, home) and any associated comorbidities. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be ascertained to assess global cardiovascular risk, and to determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment required. Evidence: MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2005 to October 2006 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed, full-text articles only. Recommendations: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Key messages in 2007 include continued emphasis on the expedited, accurate diagnosis of hypertension, the importance of assessing the risk of cerebrovascular events as part of global risk assessment, the need for ongoing reassessment of patients with high normal blood pressure, and reviews of recent studies involving laboratory testing and home monitoring. Validation: All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and were voted on by the 57 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported here received at least 70% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)529-538
Number of pages10
JournalCanadian Journal of Cardiology
Volume23
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 May 2007
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Blood pressure
  • Diagnosis
  • Guidelines
  • High blood pressure
  • Hypertension
  • Risk factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The 2007 Canadian Hypertension Education Program recommendations for the management of hypertension: Part 1 - Blood pressure measurement, diagnosis and assessment of risk'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this