Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The seroprevalence of Rickettsia conorii in humans living in villages of Tokat Province in Turkey, where Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus is endemic, and epidemiological similarities of both infectious agents

  • Turabi Güneş*
  • , Ömer Poyraz
  • , Mehmet Ataş
  • , Nergiz Hacer Turgut
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Cumhuriyet University
  • Sivas Health Directorate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: Tokat Province is an epicenter for Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) in Turkey. The aim of this study was to investigate the seroprevalence of Rickettsia conorii and to clarify the epidemiological similarities between CCHFV and R. conorii in Tokat Province. Materials and methods: The prevalence of antibodies reactive with R. conorii was examined by ELISA in 364 sera, 151 of which were seropositive for CCHFV. Results: The overall prevalence of antibodies reactive with R. conorii was 36.81%. The prevalence of antibodies to R. conorii infection was higher in humans who showed CCHFV seropositivity than seronegativity, 52.32% and 25.82%, respectively (P = 0.001). A significant difference in seroprevalence was found between groups who had a history of tick bite and who did not, 41.52% and 29.29%, respectively (P = 0.019). Conclusion: Our data show that people who are a risk group for CCHFV are likely to be a risk group for R. conorii.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-448
Number of pages8
JournalTurkish Journal of Medical Sciences
Volume42
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Rickettsia conorii, Mediterranean spotted fever, seroprevalence, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, tickborne infections, Turkey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The seroprevalence of Rickettsia conorii in humans living in villages of Tokat Province in Turkey, where Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus is endemic, and epidemiological similarities of both infectious agents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this