Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Treatments for intracranial hypertension in acute brain-injured patients: grading, timing, and association with outcome. Data from the SYNAPSE-ICU study

  • the SYNAPSE-ICU Investigators
  • Istituto di Ricovero e Cura A Carattere Scientifico for Oncology
  • University of Genoa
  • Université di Milano-Bicocca
  • Université di Pavia
  • Université libre de Bruxelles
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo Monza

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Uncertainties remain about the safety and efficacy of therapies for managing intracranial hypertension in acute brain injured (ABI) patients. This study aims to describe the therapeutical approaches used in ABI, with/without intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, among different pathologies and across different countries, and their association with six months mortality and neurological outcome. Methods: A preplanned subanalysis of the SYNAPSE-ICU study, a multicentre, prospective, international, observational cohort study, describing the ICP treatment, graded according to Therapy Intensity Level (TIL) scale, in patients with ABI during the first week of intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Results: 2320 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 55 (I-III quartiles = 39–69) years, and 800 (34.5%) were female. During the first week from ICU admission, no-basic TIL was used in 382 (16.5%) patients, mild-moderate in 1643 (70.8%), and extreme in 295 cases (eTIL, 12.7%). Patients who received eTIL were younger (median age 49 (I–III quartiles = 35–62) vs 56 (40–69) years, p < 0.001), with less cardiovascular pre-injury comorbidities (859 (44%) vs 90 (31.4%), p < 0.001), with more episodes of neuroworsening (160 (56.1%) vs 653 (33.3%), p < 0.001), and were more frequently monitored with an ICP device (221 (74.9%) vs 1037 (51.2%), p < 0.001). Considerable variability in the frequency of use and type of eTIL adopted was observed between centres and countries. At six months, patients who received no-basic TIL had an increased risk of mortality (Hazard ratio, HR = 1.612, 95% Confidence Interval, CI = 1.243–2.091, p < 0.001) compared to patients who received eTIL. No difference was observed when comparing mild-moderate TIL with eTIL (HR = 1.017, 95% CI = 0.823–1.257, p = 0.873). No significant association between the use of TIL and neurological outcome was observed. Conclusions: During the first week of ICU admission, therapies to control high ICP are frequently used, especially mild-moderate TIL. In selected patients, the use of aggressive strategies can have a beneficial effect on six months mortality but not on neurological outcome.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-61
Number of pages12
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume49
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2023

Keywords

  • Intracranial haemorrhage
  • Intracranial pressure
  • Subarachnoid haemorrhage
  • Therapy intensity level
  • Traumatic brain injury
  • Brain
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Prospective Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Male
  • Intracranial Pressure
  • Monitoring, Physiologic
  • Glasgow Coma Scale
  • Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications
  • Female
  • Intracranial Hypertension/etiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Treatments for intracranial hypertension in acute brain-injured patients: grading, timing, and association with outcome. Data from the SYNAPSE-ICU study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this