Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods

  • Neil Cox
  • , Bruce E. Young*
  • , Philip Bowles
  • , Miguel Fernandez
  • , Julie Marin
  • , Giovanni Rapacciuolo
  • , Monika Böhm
  • , Thomas M. Brooks
  • , S. Blair Hedges
  • , Craig Hilton-Taylor
  • , Michael Hoffmann
  • , Richard K.B. Jenkins
  • , Marcelo F. Tognelli
  • , Graham J. Alexander
  • , Allen Allison
  • , Natalia B. Ananjeva
  • , Mark Auliya
  • , Luciano Javier Avila
  • , David G. Chapple
  • , Diego F. Cisneros-Heredia
  • Harold G. Cogger, Guarino R. Colli, Anslem de Silva, Carla C. Eisemberg, Johannes Els, Ansel Fong G, Tandora D. Grant, Rodney A. Hitchmough, Djoko T. Iskandar, Noriko Kidera, Marcio Martins, Shai Meiri, Nicola J. Mitchell, Sanjay Molur, Cristiano de C. Nogueira, Juan Carlos Ortiz, Johannes Penner, Anders G.J. Rhodin, Gilson A. Rivas, Mark Oliver Rödel, Uri Roll, Kate L. Sanders, Georgina Santos-Barrera, Glenn M. Shea, Stephen Spawls, Bryan L. Stuart, Krystal A. Tolley, Jean François Trape, Marcela A. Vidal, Philipp Wagner, Bryan P. Wallace, Yan Xie
*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo
  • Conservation International
  • NatureServe
  • George Mason University
  • Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Bolivia
  • Inserm
  • California Academy of Sciences
  • Zoological Society of London Institute of Zoology
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • University of the Philippines
  • Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies
  • Temple University
  • IUCN Science & Data Centre: Biodiversity Assessment & Knowledge Team
  • Zoological Society of London
  • University of the Witwatersrand
  • Bishop Museum
  • Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
  • Research Museum Alexander Koenig - Leibniz Institute for Animal Biodiversity
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Monash University
  • Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad
  • Australian Museum
  • Universidade de Brasília
  • South Asia Regional Office
  • Charles Darwin University
  • Environment and Protected Areas Authority Sharjah
  • Museo de Historia Natural “Tomás Romay”
  • Zoological Society of San Diego
  • New Zealand's Department of Conservation
  • Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Okayama University of Science
  • National Institute for Environmental Studies of Japan
  • Universidade de São Paulo
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Crawley Western Australia
  • Zoo Outreach Organization
  • University of Concepción
  • University of Freiburg
  • Museum für Naturkunde
  • Chelonian Research Foundation
  • La Universidad Del Zulia
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • University of Adelaide
  • Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
  • The University of Sydney
  • North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences
  • South African National Biodiversity Institute
  • Institut de recherche pour le développement
  • Universidad del Bio-Bio
  • Allwetterzoo Münster
  • Ecolibrium, Inc
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

377 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Comprehensive assessments of species’ extinction risks have documented the extinction crisis1 and underpinned strategies for reducing those risks2. Global assessments reveal that, among tetrapods, 40.7% of amphibians, 25.4% of mammals and 13.6% of birds are threatened with extinction3. Because global assessments have been lacking, reptiles have been omitted from conservation-prioritization analyses that encompass other tetrapods4–7. Reptiles are unusually diverse in arid regions, suggesting that they may have different conservation needs6. Here we provide a comprehensive extinction-risk assessment of reptiles and show that at least 1,829 out of 10,196 species (21.1%) are threatened—confirming a previous extrapolation8 and representing 15.6 billion years of phylogenetic diversity. Reptiles are threatened by the same major factors that threaten other tetrapods—agriculture, logging, urban development and invasive species—although the threat posed by climate change remains uncertain. Reptiles inhabiting forests, where these threats are strongest, are more threatened than those in arid habitats, contrary to our prediction. Birds, mammals and amphibians are unexpectedly good surrogates for the conservation of reptiles, although threatened reptiles with the smallest ranges tend to be isolated from other threatened tetrapods. Although some reptiles—including most species of crocodiles and turtles—require urgent, targeted action to prevent extinctions, efforts to protect other tetrapods, such as habitat preservation and control of trade and invasive species, will probably also benefit many reptiles.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)285-290
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónNature
Volumen605
N.º7909
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 12 may. 2022

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 13: Acción por el clima
    ODS 13: Acción por el clima

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A global reptile assessment highlights shared conservation needs of tetrapods'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto