TY - JOUR
T1 - Benchmarking Seismic-Based Feature Groups to Classify the Cotopaxi Volcanic Activity
AU - Perez, Noel
AU - Venegas, Pablo
AU - Benitez, Diego
AU - Grijalva, Felipe
AU - Lara, Roman
AU - Ruiz, Mario
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2004-2012 IEEE.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - We systematically and comprehensively tested almost 100 feature groups in four commonly used automatic event classifiers to find the combinations that maximize the classification performance for long-period and volcano-tectonic seismic events at Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. The feature groups tested fall into the following categories: time, fast-Fourier, wavelet transform, intensity-statistics, shape, and texture. An analysis of the relevance of feature groups highlights and finds that each classifier performs similar to one another when using the best combination of features, as determined by the mean of the area under the curve metric, with no statistically significant differences between them. The feed-forward back-propagation neural network and random forest classifiers achieved scores of 0.96 while the naive Bayes and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifiers achieved scores of 0.95. The shape and texture feature groups were the most frequently utilized (three times each) among the different classifiers, and thus, the most appropriate for classifying both types of seismic events. The kNN ( k=3 ) classifier using the shape feature group reached an excellent performance with lower algorithmic complexity. Moreover, nontraditional features like those computed from spectrogram images overcame traditional time, Fourier, and scale features when classifying seismic events.
AB - We systematically and comprehensively tested almost 100 feature groups in four commonly used automatic event classifiers to find the combinations that maximize the classification performance for long-period and volcano-tectonic seismic events at Cotopaxi volcano, Ecuador. The feature groups tested fall into the following categories: time, fast-Fourier, wavelet transform, intensity-statistics, shape, and texture. An analysis of the relevance of feature groups highlights and finds that each classifier performs similar to one another when using the best combination of features, as determined by the mean of the area under the curve metric, with no statistically significant differences between them. The feed-forward back-propagation neural network and random forest classifiers achieved scores of 0.96 while the naive Bayes and k-nearest neighbor (kNN) classifiers achieved scores of 0.95. The shape and texture feature groups were the most frequently utilized (three times each) among the different classifiers, and thus, the most appropriate for classifying both types of seismic events. The kNN ( k=3 ) classifier using the shape feature group reached an excellent performance with lower algorithmic complexity. Moreover, nontraditional features like those computed from spectrogram images overcame traditional time, Fourier, and scale features when classifying seismic events.
KW - Feature relevance
KW - feed-forward back-propagation (FFBP) neural network
KW - k-nearest neighbors (kNN)
KW - machine learning classifiers (MLCs)
KW - naive Bayes (NB)
KW - random forest (RF)
KW - seismic events classification
KW - volcano seismic events features
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121059309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3028193
DO - 10.1109/LGRS.2020.3028193
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85121059309
SN - 1545-598X
VL - 19
JO - IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
JF - IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters
ER -