TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative biology needs de novo transcriptome assemblies
T2 - drawing attention towards amphibians
AU - The Amphibian Genomics Consortium
AU - Torres-Sánchez, María
AU - Goutte, Sandra
AU - Christoph Liedtke, H.
AU - Allain, Steven J.R.
AU - Ahammed, Md Sabbir
AU - Calatayud, Natalie
AU - Comeault, Aaron
AU - Elmer, Kathryn
AU - Eterovick, Paula C.
AU - Gilbert, Edward
AU - Guayasamin, Juan M.
AU - Hernández-Poveda, Melissa
AU - Kotharambath, Ramachandran
AU - Lechuga Paredes, Pablo
AU - Mahapatra, Cuckoo
AU - Mulder, Kevin P.
AU - Nadaline, Junior
AU - Najafi-Majd, Elnaz
AU - Pollet, Nicolas
AU - Rubio, Andrew O.
AU - Sachslehner, Attila Placido
AU - Sanz-Sobrino, Laura
AU - Siu-Ting, Karen
AU - Snead, Anthony A.
AU - Strowbridge, Nicholas
AU - Espregueira Themudo, Gonçalo
AU - Barreto, Daniel Vivas
AU - Wogan, Guinevere O.U.
AU - Wollenberg Valero, Katharina C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© MARÍA TORRES-SÁNCHEZ ET AL., 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The study of transcriptomics across amphibians opens a window to understand how species have adapted to and cope with their environment, diseases, and new challenges. Transcriptomics can accelerate comparative studies across the amphibian tree of life because they capture diverse biological information at a fraction of the cost of genomics. Currently, 337 amphibians (3.82% of the described species) have transcriptomic data available, and 60 of them (0.68% of the described amphibian species) have reconstructed de novo assemblies readily accessible on public repositories. Here, we summarise taxonomic gaps for amphibian transcriptomics, highlighting studies that have used these resources in a multi-species comparative framework to uncover the genetic variation and gene expression patterns that underlie phenotypes across different aspects of amphibian biology. Given the particularities of amphibians, including their complex life cycles, we provide some guidelines to generate reference transcriptomes while identifying challenges that researchers might encounter. We explore the developmental and tissue-specific transcriptome divergence across the three amphibian orders to aid in identifying suitable target samples for reference transcriptomes (e.g., developmental stages, brain, kidney, reproductive tissues). Since annotations for amphibians are very limited, we recommend researchers to be critical of annotations assigned through homology. We encourage the availability of transcriptome assemblies in public repositories, sparing computational efforts and costs to advance multi-species research. Comparative studies should expand taxonomic and ecological breadth to unveil the molecular bases of evolution, adaptation, and resilience mechanisms for one of the most imperilled groups of vertebrates.
AB - The study of transcriptomics across amphibians opens a window to understand how species have adapted to and cope with their environment, diseases, and new challenges. Transcriptomics can accelerate comparative studies across the amphibian tree of life because they capture diverse biological information at a fraction of the cost of genomics. Currently, 337 amphibians (3.82% of the described species) have transcriptomic data available, and 60 of them (0.68% of the described amphibian species) have reconstructed de novo assemblies readily accessible on public repositories. Here, we summarise taxonomic gaps for amphibian transcriptomics, highlighting studies that have used these resources in a multi-species comparative framework to uncover the genetic variation and gene expression patterns that underlie phenotypes across different aspects of amphibian biology. Given the particularities of amphibians, including their complex life cycles, we provide some guidelines to generate reference transcriptomes while identifying challenges that researchers might encounter. We explore the developmental and tissue-specific transcriptome divergence across the three amphibian orders to aid in identifying suitable target samples for reference transcriptomes (e.g., developmental stages, brain, kidney, reproductive tissues). Since annotations for amphibians are very limited, we recommend researchers to be critical of annotations assigned through homology. We encourage the availability of transcriptome assemblies in public repositories, sparing computational efforts and costs to advance multi-species research. Comparative studies should expand taxonomic and ecological breadth to unveil the molecular bases of evolution, adaptation, and resilience mechanisms for one of the most imperilled groups of vertebrates.
KW - Amphibians
KW - Anura
KW - Caudata
KW - gene expression
KW - Gymnophiona
KW - molecular evolution
KW - RNA-Seq
KW - transcriptomics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105006676466&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1163/15685381-bja10232
DO - 10.1163/15685381-bja10232
M3 - Artículo de revisión
AN - SCOPUS:105006676466
SN - 0173-5373
JO - Amphibia Reptilia
JF - Amphibia Reptilia
ER -