Critics at the edge? Decolonizing methodologies in International Relations

Manuela L. Picq

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

9 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This article reviews three recent books that challenge conventional ways of doing International Relations. The rich arguments deployed in these books provide different yet complementary perspectives that can help us to rethink International Relations. They share a concern over what they regard as International Relations' entrenched coloniality and disciplinary straitjacket. They challenge what they identify as the hegemonic practices of conventional knowledge production that exclude alternative ways of knowing the international. They explore how International Relations is produced in the non-core and how personal narratives are embedded in theory-making, and question the claims to science of conventional methodologies. Yet, if all three books contribute to a praiseworthy attempt to trespass disciplinary boundaries, they also perpetuate hegemonic silences by failing adequately to engage with gender and indigenous perspectives.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)444-455
Número de páginas12
PublicaciónInternational Political Science Review
Volumen34
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublicada - sep. 2013

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Critics at the edge? Decolonizing methodologies in International Relations'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto