TY - JOUR
T1 - Dynamic coordinating non-equilibrium
AU - Gangotena, Santiago J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
PY - 2017/3/1
Y1 - 2017/3/1
N2 - Neo-Walrasian conceptualizations and DSGE models are incompatible with the emergence of coordination and discoordination in economic activity. While many conceptualizations stemming from the Austrian tradition are generally consistent with these fundamental problems, their process driven approach is hampered by the use of equilibrium constructs. This paper argues for the adoption of formal models that avoid this problem by addressing the following questions. Why should Austrian macroeconomists model? Where do models fit in with respect to pure and applied theory? How to model without equilibrium? To answer this final question I present a structure that aids in the construction and communication of such models.
AB - Neo-Walrasian conceptualizations and DSGE models are incompatible with the emergence of coordination and discoordination in economic activity. While many conceptualizations stemming from the Austrian tradition are generally consistent with these fundamental problems, their process driven approach is hampered by the use of equilibrium constructs. This paper argues for the adoption of formal models that avoid this problem by addressing the following questions. Why should Austrian macroeconomists model? Where do models fit in with respect to pure and applied theory? How to model without equilibrium? To answer this final question I present a structure that aids in the construction and communication of such models.
KW - Agent based computational economics
KW - Coordination
KW - Economic methodology
KW - Neo Austrian
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978062929&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11138-016-0355-y
DO - 10.1007/s11138-016-0355-y
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:84978062929
SN - 0889-3047
VL - 30
SP - 51
EP - 82
JO - Review of Austrian Economics
JF - Review of Austrian Economics
IS - 1
ER -