Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke

  • Joseph P. Broderick*
  • , Yuko Y. Palesch
  • , Andrew M. Demchuk
  • , Sharon D. Yeatts
  • , Pooja Khatri
  • , Michael D. Hill
  • , Edward C. Jauch
  • , Tudor G. Jovin
  • , Bernard Yan
  • , Frank L. Silver
  • , Rüdiger Von Kummer
  • , Carlos A. Molina
  • , Bart M. Demaerschalk
  • , Ronald Budzik
  • , Wayne M. Clark
  • , Osama O. Zaidat
  • , Tim W. Malisch
  • , Mayank Goyal
  • , Wouter J. Schonewille
  • , Mikael Mazighi
  • Stefan T. Engelter, Craig Anderson, Judith Spilker, Janice Carrozzella, Karla J. Ryckborst, L. Scott Janis, Renée H. Martin, Lydia D. Foster, Thomas A. Tomsick
*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of Calgary
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine
  • Technische Universität Dresden
  • Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari
  • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ
  • Riverside Methodist Hospital
  • Oregon Health Sciences University
  • Medical College of Wisconsin
  • Alexian Brothers Medical Center
  • Utrecht University
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Bichat Hospital
  • University of Basel
  • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

1631 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy is increasingly used after the administration of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) for patients with moderate-to-severe acute ischemic stroke, but whether a combined approach is more effective than intravenous t-PA alone is uncertain. METHODS: We randomly assigned eligible patients who had received intravenous t-PA within 3 hours after symptom onset to receive additional endovascular therapy or intravenous t-PA alone, in a 2:1 ratio. The primary outcome measure was a modified Rankin scale score of 2 or less (indicating functional independence) at 90 days (scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS: The study was stopped early because of futility after 656 participants had undergone randomization (434 patients to endovascular therapy and 222 to intravenous t-PA alone). The proportion of participants with a modified Rankin score of 2 or less at 90 days did not differ significantly according to treatment (40.8% with endovascular therapy and 38.7% with intravenous t-PA; absolute adjusted difference, 1.5 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -6.1 to 9.1, with adjustment for the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score [8-19, indicating moderately severe stroke, or ≥20, indicating severe stroke]), nor were there significant differences for the predefined subgroups of patients with an NIHSS score of 20 or higher (6.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -4.4 to 18.1) and those with a score of 19 or lower (-1.0 percentage point; 95% CI, -10.8 to 8.8). Findings in the endovascular-therapy and intravenous t-PA groups were similar for mortality at 90 days (19.1% and 21.6%, respectively; P = 0.52) and the proportion of patients with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 30 hours after initiation of t-PA (6.2% and 5.9%, respectively; P = 0.83). CONCLUSIONS: The trial showed similar safety outcomes and no significant difference in functional independence with endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA, as compared with intravenous t-PA alone. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00359424.)

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)893-903
Número de páginas11
PublicaciónNew England Journal of Medicine
Volumen368
N.º10
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 7 mar. 2013
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Endovascular therapy after intravenous t-PA versus t-PA alone for stroke'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto