TY - JOUR
T1 - Household preferences for improved water services in the Galápagos Islands
AU - Vásquez, William F.
AU - Raheem, Nejem
AU - Quiroga, Diego
AU - Ochoa-Herrera, Valeria
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Like many islands worldwide, Santa Cruz, the most populated of Ecuador's Galápagos Islands, has limited resources to provide safe drinking water to an increasing number of inhabitants and tourists. Currently, households receive brackish water at their tap, which is rationed to a few hours per day. Insufficient recovery of water supply costs is an impediment to improving water services. Against this backdrop, we implemented a contingent valuation survey to investigate whether households are willing to pay for improved water services. Using split-sample scenarios that allow for scope and part-whole tests, we elicited household preferences for three improvements: 1) uninterrupted water supply, 2) drinkable tap water, and 3) combining both. Our estimation results indicate that households are willing to pay for safe drinking water. Conversely, our willingness-to-pay estimates suggest that households are indifferent about improvements of service reliability unless water quality is improved as well. The median willingness to pay for concurrent improvements of system reliability and water quality is estimated at approximately $36/month, about 2.1% of average monthly household income. This study has policy implications as it demonstrates that households deem system reliability and water quality as complementary improvements.
AB - Like many islands worldwide, Santa Cruz, the most populated of Ecuador's Galápagos Islands, has limited resources to provide safe drinking water to an increasing number of inhabitants and tourists. Currently, households receive brackish water at their tap, which is rationed to a few hours per day. Insufficient recovery of water supply costs is an impediment to improving water services. Against this backdrop, we implemented a contingent valuation survey to investigate whether households are willing to pay for improved water services. Using split-sample scenarios that allow for scope and part-whole tests, we elicited household preferences for three improvements: 1) uninterrupted water supply, 2) drinkable tap water, and 3) combining both. Our estimation results indicate that households are willing to pay for safe drinking water. Conversely, our willingness-to-pay estimates suggest that households are indifferent about improvements of service reliability unless water quality is improved as well. The median willingness to pay for concurrent improvements of system reliability and water quality is estimated at approximately $36/month, about 2.1% of average monthly household income. This study has policy implications as it demonstrates that households deem system reliability and water quality as complementary improvements.
KW - Contingent valuation
KW - Continuous water supply
KW - Ecuador
KW - Galápagos islands
KW - Safe drinking water
KW - Willingness to pay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103781153&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.wre.2021.100180
DO - 10.1016/j.wre.2021.100180
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85103781153
SN - 2212-4284
VL - 34
JO - Water Resources and Economics
JF - Water Resources and Economics
M1 - 100180
ER -