Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis

  • Napasri Chaisinanunkul
  • , Shaan Khurshid
  • , Brian H. Buck
  • , Alejandro A. Rabinstein
  • , Christopher D. Anderson
  • , Michael D. Hill
  • , Jennifer E. Fugate
  • , Jeffrey L. Saver*
  • *Autor correspondiente de este trabajo
  • Phyathai 1 Hospital
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Alberta
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of Calgary
  • David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

11 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Introduction: Long-term cardiac monitoring studies have unveiled low-burden, occult atrial fibrillation (AF) in some patients with otherwise cryptogenic stroke (CS), but occult AF is also found in some individuals without a stroke history and in patients with stroke of a known cause (KS). Clinical management would be aided by estimates of how often occult AF in a patient with CS is causal vs. incidental. Methods: Through a systematic search, we identified all case–control and cohort studies applying identical long-term monitoring techniques to both patients with CS and KS. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis across these studies to determine the best estimate of the differential frequency of occult AF in CS and KS among all patients and across age subgroups. We then applied Bayes' theorem to determine the probability that occult AF is causal or incidental. Results: The systematic search identified three case–control and cohort studies enrolling 560 patients (315 CS, 245 KS). Methods of long-term monitoring were implantable loop recorder in 31.0%, extended external monitoring in 67.9%, and both in 1.2%. Crude cumulative rates of AF detection were CS 47/315 (14.9%) vs. KS 23/246 (9.3%). In the formal meta-analysis, the summary odds ratio for occult AF in CS vs. KS in all patients was 1.80 (95% CI, 1.05–3.07), p = 0.03. With the application of Bayes' theorem, the corresponding probabilities indicated that, when present, occult AF in patients with CS is causal in 38.2% (95% CI, 0–63.6%) of patients. Analyses stratified by age suggested that detected occult AF in patients with CS was causal in 62.3% (95 CI, 0–87.1%) of patients under the age of 65 years and 28.5% (95 CI, 0–63.7%) of patients aged 65 years and older but estimates had limited precision. Conclusion: Current evidence is preliminary, but it indicates that in cryptogenic stroke when occult AF is found, it is causal in about 38.2% of patients. These findings suggest that anticoagulation therapy may be beneficial to prevent recurrent stroke in a substantial proportion of patients with CS found to have occult AF.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo1103664
PublicaciónFrontiers in Neurology
Volumen14
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 2023
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'How often is occult atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke causal vs. incidental? A meta-analysis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto