TY - JOUR
T1 - How to include and recognize the work of ornithologists based in the Neotropics
T2 - Fourteen actions for OrnithologicalApplications, Ornithology, and other global-scope journals
AU - Inzunza, Ernesto Ruelas
AU - Cockle, Kristina L.
AU - Montellano, María Gabriela Núñez
AU - Fontana, Carla S.
AU - Lima, Cecilia Cuatianquiz
AU - Echeverry-Galvis, María A.
AU - Fernández-Gómez, Ronald A.
AU - Montaño-Centellas, Flavia A.
AU - Bonaccorso, Elisa
AU - Lambertucci, Sergio A.
AU - Cornelius, Cintia
AU - Bosque, Carlos
AU - Bugoni, Leandro
AU - Salinas-Melgoza, Alejandro
AU - Renton, Katherine
AU - Freile, Juan F.
AU - Angulo, Fernando
AU - Valdés, Lourdes Mugica
AU - Velarde, Enriqueta
AU - Cuadros, Sandra
AU - Miño, Carolina Isabel
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © American Ornithological Society 2023. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/2/3
Y1 - 2023/2/3
N2 - Global-scope scientific journals have played an important role in upholding a colonial legacy of north-south inequities in ornithology, and they now have a key role to play in increasing equity in scientific publishing. We explore common barriers faced by ornithologists in the Neotropics (Latin America and the Caribbean) and suggest priority actions that Ornithological Applications, Ornithology, and other global-scope ornithological journals can take to increase equity in publication and research uptake. Among the most important problems, we identified (1) restrictive (and north-biased) criteria for assessing research “importance” and “novelty,” (2) the high publication costs of the Author Pay (Gold) Open Access model, (3) language hegemony, (4) under-representation of ornithologists from the Neotropics on editorial boards and as lead authors on invited articles, and (5) lack of attention to ethics of collaboration and citation. We recommend that Ornithological Applications, Ornithology, and other global-scope ornithological journals (1) adjust their criteria for publication with the aim to publish all scientifically robust and ethically rigorous ornithology research submitted by first authors based in the Neotropics, including negative results and articles on basic biology; (2) maintain or create options for free or low-cost publication; (3) offer the option of a submission and review process in Spanish (and possibly other languages in the future); (4) increase the representation of ornithologists based in the Neotropics (especially women and those belonging to other marginalized groups) in core editorial teams and on editorial boards; and (5) introduce structured reflexivity statements, in which authors declare how local scientists were involved in the research and how equity was promoted in the collaboration that resulted in the manuscript. For these changes to be broadly effective in the long term, ornithologists across the Global South, and Indigenous, Brown, and Black ornithologists globally, should play lead roles in designing, implementing, and assessing the effectiveness of journal policies and programs. Spanish and Portuguese translations are available in the supplementary material.
AB - Global-scope scientific journals have played an important role in upholding a colonial legacy of north-south inequities in ornithology, and they now have a key role to play in increasing equity in scientific publishing. We explore common barriers faced by ornithologists in the Neotropics (Latin America and the Caribbean) and suggest priority actions that Ornithological Applications, Ornithology, and other global-scope ornithological journals can take to increase equity in publication and research uptake. Among the most important problems, we identified (1) restrictive (and north-biased) criteria for assessing research “importance” and “novelty,” (2) the high publication costs of the Author Pay (Gold) Open Access model, (3) language hegemony, (4) under-representation of ornithologists from the Neotropics on editorial boards and as lead authors on invited articles, and (5) lack of attention to ethics of collaboration and citation. We recommend that Ornithological Applications, Ornithology, and other global-scope ornithological journals (1) adjust their criteria for publication with the aim to publish all scientifically robust and ethically rigorous ornithology research submitted by first authors based in the Neotropics, including negative results and articles on basic biology; (2) maintain or create options for free or low-cost publication; (3) offer the option of a submission and review process in Spanish (and possibly other languages in the future); (4) increase the representation of ornithologists based in the Neotropics (especially women and those belonging to other marginalized groups) in core editorial teams and on editorial boards; and (5) introduce structured reflexivity statements, in which authors declare how local scientists were involved in the research and how equity was promoted in the collaboration that resulted in the manuscript. For these changes to be broadly effective in the long term, ornithologists across the Global South, and Indigenous, Brown, and Black ornithologists globally, should play lead roles in designing, implementing, and assessing the effectiveness of journal policies and programs. Spanish and Portuguese translations are available in the supplementary material.
KW - academic publishing
KW - editorial practice
KW - equity
KW - novelty
KW - open access
KW - peer review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163155659&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ornithapp/duac047
DO - 10.1093/ornithapp/duac047
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85163155659
SN - 0010-5422
VL - 125
JO - Condor
JF - Condor
IS - 1
M1 - duac0475
ER -