TY - JOUR
T1 - Human Versus Artificial Intelligence
T2 - A Data-Driven Approach to Real-Time Process Management During Complex Engineering Design
AU - Gyory, Joshua T.
AU - Soria Zurita, Nicolás F.
AU - Martin, Jay
AU - Balon, Corey
AU - McComb, Christopher
AU - Kotovsky, Kenneth
AU - Cagan, Jonathan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by ASME
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Managing the design process of teams has been shown to considerably improve problem-solving behaviors and resulting final outcomes. Automating this activity presents significant opportunities in delivering interventions that dynamically adapt to the state of a team in order to reap the most impact. In this work, an artificial intelligence (AI) agent is created to manage the design process of engineering teams in real time, tracking features of teams’ actions and communications during a complex design and path-planning task in multidisciplinary teams. Teams are also placed under the guidance of human process managers for comparison. Regarding outcomes, teams perform equally as well under both types of management, with trends toward even superior performance from the AI-managed teams. The managers’ intervention strategies and team perceptions of those strategies are also explored, illuminating some intriguing similarities. Both the AI and human process managers focus largely on communication-based interventions, though differences start to emerge in the distribution of interventions across team roles. Furthermore, team members perceive the interventions from both the AI and human manager as equally relevant and helpful, and believe the AI agent to be just as sensitive to the needs of the team. Thus, the overall results show that the AI manager agent introduced in this work is able to match the capabilities of humans, showing potential in automating the management of a complex design process.
AB - Managing the design process of teams has been shown to considerably improve problem-solving behaviors and resulting final outcomes. Automating this activity presents significant opportunities in delivering interventions that dynamically adapt to the state of a team in order to reap the most impact. In this work, an artificial intelligence (AI) agent is created to manage the design process of engineering teams in real time, tracking features of teams’ actions and communications during a complex design and path-planning task in multidisciplinary teams. Teams are also placed under the guidance of human process managers for comparison. Regarding outcomes, teams perform equally as well under both types of management, with trends toward even superior performance from the AI-managed teams. The managers’ intervention strategies and team perceptions of those strategies are also explored, illuminating some intriguing similarities. Both the AI and human process managers focus largely on communication-based interventions, though differences start to emerge in the distribution of interventions across team roles. Furthermore, team members perceive the interventions from both the AI and human manager as equally relevant and helpful, and believe the AI agent to be just as sensitive to the needs of the team. Thus, the overall results show that the AI manager agent introduced in this work is able to match the capabilities of humans, showing potential in automating the management of a complex design process.
KW - artificial intelligence
KW - cognitive-based design
KW - design teams
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124492773&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/1.4052488
DO - 10.1115/1.4052488
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:85124492773
SN - 1050-0472
VL - 144
JO - Journal of Mechanical Design
JF - Journal of Mechanical Design
IS - 2
M1 - 021405
ER -