Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Regulatory discrepancies and patient-safety risks from the continued marketing of withdrawn medicines in Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru (2014–2025)

  • Aida Miranda
  • , Camila Lopez
  • , Shabnam Santos
  • , Ariel Moncayo
  • , Fatima Morales*
  • , Enrique Teran*
  • *Autor correspondiente de este trabajo
  • Universidad de Sevilla
  • Escuela Superior Politécnica de Chimborazo
  • Universidad San Francisco de Quito
  • Temple University

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

Objectives: To evaluate whether international decisions to withdraw medicines for safety, efficacy, or commercial reasons were reflected in the regulatory actions of Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional analysis identified active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) withdrawn globally by Stringent Regulatory Authorities (SRAs) between January 1, 2014, and June 30, 2025. Data were obtained from published SRA communications and verified in national regulatory databases – ARCSA (Ecuador), INVIMA (Colombia), and DIGEMID (Peru) – to determine current marketing status. APIs were categorized as never registered (no evidence in current or archival databases), previously registered (formally canceled/suspended with a safe of efficacy rationale), previously registered (authorization expired without an explicit safety rationale), or currently registered (active marketing authorization). Results: Fifty-three APIs were withdrawn internationally, predominantly for safety concerns (69.81 %), followed by lack of efficacy (22.64 %) and manufacturer decisions (7.55 %). The European Medicines Agency issued most withdrawals, particularly for oncologic and hormonal agents. Despite these actions, Ecuador retained 16.98 % of withdrawn APIs on its market, Peru 7.55 %, and Colombia 7.55 %. Persisting products included modified-release paracetamol, hydroxyethyl starch, and ulipristal 5 mg – drugs associated with hepatotoxicity or fatal adverse events. Regulatory databases often list expired or active authorizations without public withdrawal notices. Conclusions: Substantial misalignment persists between international and Andean regulatory decisions. The continued regulatory authorization of withdrawn medicines highlights weaknesses in pharmacovigilance and transparency, underscoring the urgent need for regional harmonization and public disclosure of regulatory actions.

Idioma originalInglés
PublicaciónDrug Metabolism and Personalized Therapy
DOI
EstadoAceptada/en prensa - 2026

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Regulatory discrepancies and patient-safety risks from the continued marketing of withdrawn medicines in Ecuador, Colombia, and Peru (2014–2025)'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto