Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Shortfalls in the protection of Important Shark and Ray Areas undermine shark conservation efforts in the Central and South American Pacific

  • Théophile L. Mouton
  • , Adriana Gonzalez-Pestana
  • , Christoph A. Rohner
  • , Ryan Charles
  • , Emiliano García-Rodríguez
  • , Peter M. Kyne
  • , Amanda Batlle-Morera
  • , Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara
  • , Asia O. Armstrong
  • , Enzo Acuña
  • , Joanna Alfaro-Shigueto
  • , Randall Arauz
  • , Cristopher G. Avalos-Castillo
  • , Ely Augustinus
  • , Sandra Bessudo
  • , Enrique Barraza
  • , Carlos Bustamante
  • , Elpis J. Chávez
  • , Eduardo Ramon Espinoza
  • , Mario Espinoza
  • Ana Hacohen-Domené, Alex R. Hearn, Grettel M. Hernández, Felipe Galván-Magaña, José A. Gonzalez-Leiva, James T. Ketchum, Felipe Ladino, Frida Lara-Lizardi, Jorge Manuel Morales-Saldaña, Naití Morales Serrano, Jeffry Madrigal-Mesén, Paola A. Mejía-Falla, Andrés F. Navia, Gabriela M. Ochoa, Marta D. Palacios, César R. Peñaherrera-Palma, Francisco Polanco-Vásquez, Yehudi Rodríguez-Arriatti, Luz E. Saldaña-Ruiz, Oscar Sosa-Nishizaki, Javier Tovar-Ávila, Ángel J. Vega, Ximena Velez-Zuazo, Melany Villate-Moreno, Ilena Zanella, Rima W. Jabado*
*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature Species Survival Commission Shark Specialist Group
  • Universidad Científica del Sur
  • Marine Megafauna Foundation
  • Charles Darwin University
  • Tethys Research Institute
  • International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
  • University of the Sunshine Coast
  • Universidad Católica del Norte
  • Pro Delphinus
  • Marine Watch International
  • MigraMar
  • Ciudad Universitaria
  • Fundación Malpelo y Otros Ecosistemas Marinos
  • Col. y Calle Las Mercedes
  • Universidad de Antofagasta
  • Centro Rescate de Especies Marinas Amenazadas (CREMA)
  • Direccion Parque Nacional Galapagos
  • Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad INABIO
  • University of Costa Rica
  • University of the Valley of Guatemala
  • Instituto Nicaragüense de la Pesca y Acuicultura
  • Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas
  • Universidad Francisco Gavidia
  • Pelagios Kakunjá A.C.
  • Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste (CIBNOR)
  • ORGCAS
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • McGill University
  • Mantas Costa Rica
  • Fundación Colombiana para la Investigación y Conservación de Tiburones y Rayas
  • WCS
  • Florida International University
  • Ilili
  • Mobula Conservation
  • The Manta Trust
  • Wildlife Conservation Society
  • Shark Defenders
  • Centro de Investigación Científicay de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE)
  • National Fisheries and Aquaculture Institute (INAPESCA)
  • University of Panama
  • Smithsonian National Zoological Park and Conservation Biology Institute
  • Fundación MarAdentro
  • Asociación Conservacionista Misión Tiburón
  • James Cook University Queensland
  • Elasmo Project

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículorevisión exhaustiva

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Global biodiversity targets require nations to designate 30 % of their marine waters as protected areas by 2030. Sharks, rays, and chimaeras (hereafter ‘sharks’) are key components of aquatic ecosystems; however, over a third are globally threatened with extinction. Across the Central and South American Pacific Ocean region, we (i) assessed trends in Marine Protected Area (MPA) expansion and extent across the 12 nations of the region; (ii) quantified the spatial overlap between MPAs and Important Shark and Ray Areas (ISRAs); and (iii) evaluated the effectiveness of the current MPA governance structure at protecting sharks and their critical habitat. There has been a recent rapid increase in the establishment of MPAs with 90 % of current MPAs designated since 2010. Yet, El Salvador, Guatemala, Peru, and Honduras still protect less than 10 % of their waters. We find that ISRAs overlap with all MPAs by only 15.6 % and with no-take MPAs by 7.3 %. This raises concerns about the low level of protection afforded to critical shark habitats in the region. Of 182 MPAs identified, 41.8 % do not have a management plan, comprising 39.8 % of the total MPA surface area. Mexico, Costa Rica, and Colombia have relatively strong governance frameworks in place and, along with Panama, Honduras, and Ecuador, represent the highest overlap between MPAs and ISRAs. However, the contribution of the remaining six countries to shark protection via MPAs is low based on limited spatial overlap with ISRAs (<2 %). As countries mobilise to meet the 30×30 target, we propose considering ISRAs as a key component of spatial planning when designing new MPAs, designating existing partially protected areas as no-take zones, or reshaping the boundaries of existing MPAs.

Idioma originalInglés
Número de artículo106448
PublicaciónMarine Policy
Volumen171
DOI
EstadoPublicada - ene. 2025

ODS de las Naciones Unidas

Este resultado contribuye a los siguientes Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible

  1. ODS 14: Vida submarina
    ODS 14: Vida submarina

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Shortfalls in the protection of Important Shark and Ray Areas undermine shark conservation efforts in the Central and South American Pacific'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto