TY - JOUR
T1 - The Brussels consensus for non-invasive ICP monitoring when invasive systems are not available in the care of TBI patients (the B-ICONIC consensus, recommendations, and management algorithm)
AU - Robba, Chiara
AU - Picetti, Edoardo
AU - Vásquez-García, Sebastián
AU - Abulhasan, Yasser B.
AU - Ain, Amelia
AU - Adeleye, Amos O.
AU - Aries, Marcel
AU - Brasil, Sérgio
AU - Badenes, Rafael
AU - Bertuccio, Alessandro
AU - Bouzat, Pierre
AU - Bustamante, Luis
AU - Calabro’, Lorenzo
AU - Njimi, Hassane
AU - Cardim, Danilo
AU - Citerio, Giuseppe
AU - Czosnyka, Marek
AU - Geeraerts, Thomas
AU - Godoy, Daniel A.
AU - Hirzallah, Mohammad I.
AU - Devi, Bhagavatula Indira
AU - Jibaja, Manuel
AU - Lochner, Piergiorgio
AU - Mijangos Méndez, Julio C.
AU - Meyfroidt, Geert
AU - Munusamy, Thangaraj
AU - Portilla, Juan Pinedo
AU - Prabhakar, Hemanshu
AU - Rasulo, Frank
AU - Sánchez Parra, Diana M.
AU - Sarwal, Aarti
AU - Shrestha, Gentle S.
AU - Shukla, Dhaval P.
AU - Sung, Gene
AU - Tirsit, Abenezer
AU - Vásquez, Franly
AU - Videtta, Walter
AU - Wang, Yu Lin
AU - Paiva, Wellingson S.
AU - Taccone, Fabio Silvio
AU - Rubiano, Andres M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2025.
PY - 2025/1
Y1 - 2025/1
N2 - Background: Invasive systems are commonly used for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are considered the gold standard. The availability of invasive ICP monitoring is heterogeneous, and in low- and middle-income settings, these systems are not routinely employed due to high cost or limited accessibility. The aim of this consensus was to develop recommendations to guide monitoring and ICP-driven therapies in TBI using non-invasive ICP (nICP) systems. Methods: A panel of 41 experts, that regularly use nICP systems for guiding TBI care, was established. Three scoping and four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were performed summarizing the current global-literature evidence. A modified Delphi method was applied for the development of recommendations. An in-person meeting with group discussions and voting was conducted. Strong recommendations were defined for an agreement of at least 85%. Weak recommendations were defined for an agreement of 75–85%. Results: A total of 34 recommendations were provided (32 Strong, 2 Weak) divided into three domains: general consideration for nICP use, management of ICP using nICP methods and thresholds of nICP tools for escalating/de-escalating treatment. We developed four clinical algorithms for escalating treatment and heatmaps for de-escalating treatment. Conclusions: Using a mixed-method approach involving literature review and an in-person consensus by experts, a set of recommendations designed to assist clinicians managing TBI patients using nICP systems plus clinical assessment, in the presence or absence of brain imaging, were built. Further clinical studies are required to validate the potential use of these recommendations in the daily clinical practice.
AB - Background: Invasive systems are commonly used for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and are considered the gold standard. The availability of invasive ICP monitoring is heterogeneous, and in low- and middle-income settings, these systems are not routinely employed due to high cost or limited accessibility. The aim of this consensus was to develop recommendations to guide monitoring and ICP-driven therapies in TBI using non-invasive ICP (nICP) systems. Methods: A panel of 41 experts, that regularly use nICP systems for guiding TBI care, was established. Three scoping and four systematic reviews with meta-analysis were performed summarizing the current global-literature evidence. A modified Delphi method was applied for the development of recommendations. An in-person meeting with group discussions and voting was conducted. Strong recommendations were defined for an agreement of at least 85%. Weak recommendations were defined for an agreement of 75–85%. Results: A total of 34 recommendations were provided (32 Strong, 2 Weak) divided into three domains: general consideration for nICP use, management of ICP using nICP methods and thresholds of nICP tools for escalating/de-escalating treatment. We developed four clinical algorithms for escalating treatment and heatmaps for de-escalating treatment. Conclusions: Using a mixed-method approach involving literature review and an in-person consensus by experts, a set of recommendations designed to assist clinicians managing TBI patients using nICP systems plus clinical assessment, in the presence or absence of brain imaging, were built. Further clinical studies are required to validate the potential use of these recommendations in the daily clinical practice.
KW - Automated pupillometry
KW - Non-invasive intracranial pressure
KW - Optic nerve sheath diameter
KW - Transcranial Doppler
KW - Traumatic brain injury
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85217545508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00134-024-07756-2
DO - 10.1007/s00134-024-07756-2
M3 - Artículo
C2 - 39847066
AN - SCOPUS:85217545508
SN - 0342-4642
VL - 51
SP - 4
EP - 20
JO - Intensive Care Medicine
JF - Intensive Care Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - e0953
ER -