TY - JOUR
T1 - The Comuna Question
T2 - Jurisdiction, the State, and Legitimacy in Rural Ecuador
AU - Colloredo-Mansfeld, Rudi
AU - Lyall, Angus
AU - Salas, Bryan
AU - Maigua Moran, Luis Malqui
AU - Guamán González, Flor Maritza
AU - Gualán Guaillas, Mariuxi Lizbeth
AU - Guaita Noroña, Matías Adrián
AU - Valdivia, Gabriela
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Latin American Studies Association.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - In 2019 and 2022, Indigenous leaders mobilized rural comunas in general strikes that forced the national government of Ecuador to negotiate the terms of newly introduced fiscal and policy measures. These mobilizations came despite long-term demographic decline in these same rural comunas. Further, the ministries charged with granting this authority to comunas today exercise little oversight. Why, then, has the comuna persisted as the preferred form of local organization amid widespread shifts to postagrarian ways of life? We have approached this problem through field research in over a dozen rural comunas, a review of comuna registrations, interviews with comuna leadership, and intergenerational dialogues among comuna members. In practical terms, we find comuna leadership consolidating an agenda focused on infrastructure development in the place of activism for land or the pursuit of agricultural investments. At the same time, it is through rituals of registration and management that local authorities not only find legitimacy but also secure a measure of “cultural autonomy” insofar as comuna members associate the disciplined fulfillment of procedures with the historical expansion of social rights. As the younger generation pursues nonagrarian careers, older comuna members underscore the mutuality of comuna life and lay out a moral purpose and a pathway that in effect centers state procedure as essential for indigenous autonomy.
AB - In 2019 and 2022, Indigenous leaders mobilized rural comunas in general strikes that forced the national government of Ecuador to negotiate the terms of newly introduced fiscal and policy measures. These mobilizations came despite long-term demographic decline in these same rural comunas. Further, the ministries charged with granting this authority to comunas today exercise little oversight. Why, then, has the comuna persisted as the preferred form of local organization amid widespread shifts to postagrarian ways of life? We have approached this problem through field research in over a dozen rural comunas, a review of comuna registrations, interviews with comuna leadership, and intergenerational dialogues among comuna members. In practical terms, we find comuna leadership consolidating an agenda focused on infrastructure development in the place of activism for land or the pursuit of agricultural investments. At the same time, it is through rituals of registration and management that local authorities not only find legitimacy but also secure a measure of “cultural autonomy” insofar as comuna members associate the disciplined fulfillment of procedures with the historical expansion of social rights. As the younger generation pursues nonagrarian careers, older comuna members underscore the mutuality of comuna life and lay out a moral purpose and a pathway that in effect centers state procedure as essential for indigenous autonomy.
KW - Ecuador
KW - comuna
KW - jurisdiction
KW - state
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105024253320
U2 - 10.1017/lar.2025.10096
DO - 10.1017/lar.2025.10096
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:105024253320
SN - 0023-8791
JO - Latin American Research Review
JF - Latin American Research Review
ER -