TY - JOUR
T1 - Wave energy resources
T2 - Wave climate and exploitation
AU - Portilla, Jesus
AU - Sosa, Jeison
AU - Cavaleri, Luigi
N1 - Funding Information:
The model data used for the overall statistical analysis has been obtained from the ERA-Interim archive of the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts. Altimeter data has been obtained from the GlobWave project. We gratefully acknowledge the help of Luciana Bertotti in retrieving the data and of Claire Nicklin and Cesar Zambrano for revising the text. J.Portilla acknowledges the financial support of USFQ , INOCAR (project CD-INOCAR-LOG031-11), and the GlobWave project. He is also grateful for the stimulating support and benefits derived from attending the WISE meetings and discussing with many distinguished colleagues. J.Sosa acknowledges the support of the Marine Renewable Energy Center. L.Cavaleri acknowledges the support of the EU funded project MyWave (SPA 2011.1.5–03) within the 7th Framework Programme. We are also very thankful with the anonymous reviewers for their committed and constructive comments, which were very valuable in the preparation of the final manuscript.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - In identifying the most convenient zones for harvesting wave energy, it is natural to be attracted by the areas where we find the highest mean energy values. The obvious examples are the storm belts. A more careful analysis reveals that for practical use other factors need to be taken into account. Some of the main ones are the energy spread in frequency and direction, and its seasonality, without discussing the cost of the structure basically related to the conditions to be withstood. This reveals that other areas, in particular the equatorial ones, can be conveniently used, and be possibly advantageous from various points of view. Based on the results of the ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis and of altimeter data, we have carried out a comparative analysis between two locations with opposite characteristics, in the North Atlantic and in the Equatorial Pacific respectively. The quantified results confirm that less energetic, but more regular and less extreme, areas have a potential comparable to that of the classically considered storm belts.
AB - In identifying the most convenient zones for harvesting wave energy, it is natural to be attracted by the areas where we find the highest mean energy values. The obvious examples are the storm belts. A more careful analysis reveals that for practical use other factors need to be taken into account. Some of the main ones are the energy spread in frequency and direction, and its seasonality, without discussing the cost of the structure basically related to the conditions to be withstood. This reveals that other areas, in particular the equatorial ones, can be conveniently used, and be possibly advantageous from various points of view. Based on the results of the ECMWF ERA-Interim reanalysis and of altimeter data, we have carried out a comparative analysis between two locations with opposite characteristics, in the North Atlantic and in the Equatorial Pacific respectively. The quantified results confirm that less energetic, but more regular and less extreme, areas have a potential comparable to that of the classically considered storm belts.
KW - Power generation
KW - Renewable energy
KW - Spectral energy distribution
KW - Wave climate
KW - Wave energy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875630756&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.032
DO - 10.1016/j.renene.2013.02.032
M3 - Artículo
AN - SCOPUS:84875630756
SN - 0960-1481
VL - 57
SP - 594
EP - 605
JO - Renewable Energy
JF - Renewable Energy
ER -