TY - JOUR
T1 - WIP
T2 - 2024 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition
AU - Bonilla, John
AU - Valarezo, Miguel
AU - Guerra, Miguel Andrés
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2024.
PY - 2024/6/23
Y1 - 2024/6/23
N2 - Human self-evaluation is something that has been part of each one since birth and has allowed everyone to mold and develop our cognitive faculties. Over time, education has evolved in terms of content and ways of teaching students, resulting in a system based on evaluations for which students must prepare, which has generated responses such as stress, anxiety and nervousness. In response to this problem, researchers propose a teaching method where evaluations are not announced, so students must prepare constantly, being supported by activities that will help them prepare for the tests and reinforce their knowledge. These evaluations were applied in two civil engineering and two architecture courses, with a total of 121 students, where at the end of the semester a survey was conducted to observe their reaction and thoughts regarding these new evaluations. It was possible to notice how at first many of the students felt nervous, but reinforcement activities were helpful in understanding the subject and generating greater confidence when taking a test, which resulted in better performance of students, because due to the constant preparation during the semester achieved greater security of knowledge. We also discuss possible factors driving these results and new ways in which institutions could implement these pedagogical strategies to achieve academic integrity.
AB - Human self-evaluation is something that has been part of each one since birth and has allowed everyone to mold and develop our cognitive faculties. Over time, education has evolved in terms of content and ways of teaching students, resulting in a system based on evaluations for which students must prepare, which has generated responses such as stress, anxiety and nervousness. In response to this problem, researchers propose a teaching method where evaluations are not announced, so students must prepare constantly, being supported by activities that will help them prepare for the tests and reinforce their knowledge. These evaluations were applied in two civil engineering and two architecture courses, with a total of 121 students, where at the end of the semester a survey was conducted to observe their reaction and thoughts regarding these new evaluations. It was possible to notice how at first many of the students felt nervous, but reinforcement activities were helpful in understanding the subject and generating greater confidence when taking a test, which resulted in better performance of students, because due to the constant preparation during the semester achieved greater security of knowledge. We also discuss possible factors driving these results and new ways in which institutions could implement these pedagogical strategies to achieve academic integrity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85202062722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Artículo de la conferencia
AN - SCOPUS:85202062722
SN - 2153-5965
JO - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
JF - ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings
Y2 - 23 June 2024 through 26 June 2024
ER -